Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kinematic Equations - III01:18

Kinematic Equations - III

7.6K
The first two kinematic equations have time as a variable, but the third kinematic equation is independent of time. This equation expresses final velocity as a function of the acceleration and distance over which it acts. The fourth kinematic equation does not have an acceleration term and provides the final position of the object at time t in terms of the initial and final velocities. This equation is useful when the value of the constant acceleration is unknown.
Using the kinematic equations,...
7.6K
Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

12.4K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
12.4K
Kinematic Equations - II01:17

Kinematic Equations - II

9.5K
The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
9.5K
Kinematic Equations - I01:26

Kinematic Equations - I

10.5K
When an object moves with constant acceleration, the velocity of the object changes at a constant rate throughout the motion. The kinematic equations of motions are derived for such cases where the acceleration of the object is constant. The first kinematic equation gives an insight into the relationship between velocity, acceleration, and time. We can see, for example:
10.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MRI-guided detection of knee injuries as a concomitant lesion of femoral shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

EFORT open reviews·2026
Same author

Linking Brain Morphometry to Psychometric Measures and Energy-Metabolic Biomarkers in Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research·2026
Same author

Potential Applications of Additive Manufacturing in Intervertebral Disc Replacement Using Gyroid Structures with Several Thermoplastic Polyurethane Filaments.

Biomedicines·2026
Same author

In vivo kinematics of knee joint cartilage and meniscus contact areas under load application: a biomechanical MRI study.

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery·2026
Same author

Effect of thin porous ceramic coatings on implant stability: a comparative study of GB14 and β-TCP with and without Cu.

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine·2026
Same author

Assessing the Efficacy of Ortho GPT: A Comparative Study with Medical Students and General LLMs on Orthopedic Examination Questions.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

9.7K

Validation of a Finite Element Simulation for Predicting Individual Knee Joint Kinematics.

Elin Theilen1, Anna Rorich1, Thomas Lange2

  • 1Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS 28359 Bremen Germany.

IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology
|March 15, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study presents an in-vivo validated finite element (FE) simulation for predicting knee joint movement. This approach enhances understanding of knee anatomy and injuries, aiding in restoring joint function.

Keywords:
Finite element knee joint modeljoint motion predictionmodel validationpneumatic loading devicesubject-specific kinematics

More Related Videos

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
06:52

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

7.9K
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

9.7K
An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
06:52

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

7.9K
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Medical Imaging
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • Knee joint kinematics are complex and difficult to predict.
  • Understanding individual anatomy is crucial for effective knee injury treatment.
  • Current methods may not fully capture patient-specific joint mechanics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce an in-vivo validated finite element (FE) simulation for predicting individual knee joint kinematics.
  • To improve clinicians' understanding of knee anatomy and pathologies.
  • To aid in restoring physiological knee joint kinematics after injury.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a 3D FE modeling approach for individual human knee joints.
  • Utilized segmentation of anatomical structures from routine static magnetic resonance (MR) images.
  • Validated the model using MR images of eleven healthy volunteers in specific knee poses generated by a custom MR-compatible pneumatic loading device.

Main Results:

  • FE simulations achieved an average translational accuracy of 2 mm.
  • FE simulations achieved an average angular accuracy of 1 degree.
  • The model demonstrated high predictive accuracy for knee joint kinematics.

Conclusions:

  • The developed individual FE model is validated in-vivo.
  • The model can accurately predict knee joint kinematics.
  • This tool can assist in clinical decision-making for restoring knee stability and function after injuries.