Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Method of Studying Palatal Fusion using Static Organ Culture
Published on: September 19, 2015
Feeding Management and Palate Repair Timing in Infants with Cleft Palate with and without Pierre Robin Sequence: A
Jessica L Williams1,2, Kari M Lien3, Richard Kirschner4,5
1Phoenix Children's Center for Cleft and Craniofacial Care a Division of Plastic Surgery, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Insights
Infants with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) face more feeding challenges and delayed palate repair compared to those with cleft palate alone. Early feeding interventions are crucial for improving growth and timely surgical repair in infants with PRS.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric surgery
- Craniofacial anomalies
- Developmental pediatrics
Background:
- Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a congenital condition characterized by mandibular hypoplasia, glossoptosis, and cleft palate.
- Infants with PRS often experience significant feeding difficulties impacting growth and development.
- Optimal timing for palate repair in infants with cleft palate, especially those with PRS, is critical for speech and facial development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare feeding management practices in infants with cleft palate with and without PRS.
- To identify feeding difficulties and interventions that predict delayed palate repair.
- To inform clinical strategies for optimizing care in infants with PRS and cleft palate.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cross-sectional study involving 414 infants from 17 cleft palate teams.
- Data collected through parent interviews and electronic health records.
- Outcomes included feeding difficulties, growth, interventions (therapy, fortification, enteral feeding), and age at primary palate repair.
Main Results:
- Infants with PRS showed higher rates of feeding difficulties (81% vs. 61%) and poor growth (29% vs. 15%) than infants with cleft palate only.
- PRS infants received feeding interventions more frequently.
- Primary palate repair was significantly delayed in infants with PRS (mean 13.55 months) compared to cleft palate only (mean 12.05 months).
- Predictors of delayed repair included PRS diagnosis, Hispanic ethnicity, and history of poor growth.
Conclusions:
- Infants with PRS require intensive feeding support due to higher prevalence of feeding difficulties and poor growth.
- Multimodal feeding interventions should be implemented early for infants with PRS to support growth.
- Timely palate repair in infants with PRS may be facilitated by proactive and comprehensive feeding management.
Abstract:
ObjectivesCompare the feeding management practices in infants with cleft palate with and without Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) and determine if specific feeding difficulties or interventions predict delayed palate repair.DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study.SettingSeventeen cleft palate teams contributed data.Patients414 infants were included in this study: 268 infants with cleft palate only and 146 infants with cleft palate and PRS.ProceduresData were collected via parent interview and electronic health records.Main Outcome MeasuresOutcomes for the primary objective included categorical data for: history of poor growth, feeding therapy, milk fortification, use of enteral feeding, and feeding difficulties. The outcome for the secondary objective was age in months at primary palate repair.ResultsInfants with PRS had a significantly higher prevalence of feeding difficulties (81% versus 61%) and poor growth (29% versus 15%) compared to infants with cleft palate only. Infants with PRS received all feeding interventions-including feeding therapy, milk fortification, and enteral feeding-at a significantly higher frequency. Infants with PRS underwent primary palate repair at a mean age of 13.55 months (SD = 3.29) which was significantly (P < .00001) later than infants with cleft palate only who underwent palate repair at a mean age of 12.05 months (SD = 2.36). Predictors of delayed palate repair included diagnosis of PRS as well as Hispanic ethnicity and a history of poor growth.ConclusionsThese findings can be used to establish clinical directives focused on providing early, multimodal feeding interventions to promote optimal growth and timely palate repair for infants with PRS.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...

