Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

07:29
Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
11.5K
Integrating 40-GEP Testing to Improve Clinical Recommendations for Adjuvant Radiation for Cutaneous Squamous Cell
Ramesh Gopal1, Michael Marquardt2, Gaurav Singh3
1Dr. Gopal is a radiation oncologist and Associate Professor of Radiation Oncology at the New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
The Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology
|March 18, 2024
Summary
Gene expression profiling (GEP) improves cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) risk assessment beyond traditional staging. The 40-GEP test aids in personalizing adjuvant radiation therapy decisions for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Dermatology
- Genomics
Background:
- Early identification of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is crucial for preventing metastasis.
- Current prognostic tools like AJCC-8 and NCCN guidelines rely on clinicopathologic factors, limiting prognostic accuracy.
- Gene expression profiling (GEP) offers an objective metric to enhance risk stratification in cSCC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of 40-GEP testing in clinical decision-making for adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) in cSCC patients.
- To integrate 40-GEP testing into existing management guidelines (NCCN) and staging systems (AJCC-8).
- To develop a risk-based clinical workflow for ART decisions using 40-GEP results.
Main Methods:
- A multidisciplinary panel of radiation oncologists and dermatologists/Mohs surgeons convened to discuss 40-GEP utility.
- Review of the validated 40-GEP test's ability to classify patients into low (Class 1), higher (Class 2A), or highest (Class 2B) risk categories for metastasis.
- Development of a clinical workflow incorporating 40-GEP into ART decision-making.
Main Results:
- The 40-GEP test accurately classifies cSCC patients' biological risk of metastasis within three years.
- Panel identified key clinical utility for 40-GEP in escalating care for lower-stage high-risk tumors.
- 40-GEP aids in de-escalating care when ART risks outweigh benefits and in decisions on elective nodal radiation.
Conclusions:
- 40-GEP testing provides objective, actionable risk stratification for cSCC patients.
- Integrating 40-GEP into NCCN guidelines and AJCC-8 staging optimizes ART decisions.
- A risk-based workflow utilizing 40-GEP enhances personalized management for cSCC, improving outcomes.

