Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
Published on: March 6, 2019
A target containing phantom for accuracy assessment of cone-beam CT-guided histotripsy
Ayca Z Kutlu1, Grace M Minesinger2, Paul F Laeseke1,3
1Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Purpose:
Histotripsy is a nonionizing, noninvasive, and nonthermal focal tumor therapy. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) guidance was developed for targeting tumors not visible on ultrasound. This approach assumes cavitation is formed at the geometrical focal point of the therapy transducer. In practice, the exact location might vary slightly between transducers. In this study, we present a phantom with an embedded target to evaluate CBCT-guided histotripsy accuracy and assess the completeness of treatments.
Methods:
Spherical (2.8 cm) targets with alternating layers of agar and radiopaque barium were embedded in larger phantoms with similar layers. The layer geometry was designed so that targets were visible on pre-treatment CBCT scans. The actual histotripsy treatment zone was visualized via the mixing of adjacent barium and agar layers in post-treatment CBCT images. CBCT-guided histotripsy treatments of the targets were performed in six phantoms. Offsets between planned and actual treatment zones were measured and used for calibration refinement. To measure targeting accuracy after calibration refinement, six additional phantoms were treated. In a separate investigation, two groups (N = 3) of phantoms were treated to assess visualization of incomplete treatments ("undertreatment" group: 2 cm treatment within 2.8 cm tumor, "mistarget" group: 2.8 cm treatment intentionally shifted laterally). Treatment zones were segmented (3D Slicer 5.0.3), and the centroid distance between the prescribed target and actual treatment zones was quantified.
Results:
In the calibration refinement group, a 2 mm offset in the direction of ultrasound propagation (Z) was measured. After calibration refinement, the centroid-to-centroid distance between prescribed and actual treatment volumes was 0.5 ± 0.2 mm. Average difference between the prescribed and measured treatment sizes in the incomplete treatment groups was 0.5 ± 0.7 mm. In the mistarget group, the distance between prescribed and measured shifts was 0.2 ± 0.1 mm.
Conclusion:
The proposed prototype phantom allowed for accurate measurement of treatment size and location, and the CBCT visible target provided a simple way to detect misalignments for preliminary quality assurance of CBCT-guided histotripsy.
More Related Videos
06:33Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013
08:41Patient-Specific Polyvinyl Alcohol Phantom Fabrication with Ultrasound and X-Ray Contrast for Brain Tumor Surgery Planning
Published on: July 14, 2020