Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

53
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
53
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Special 50th Anniversary Issue of Biological Psychology.

Biological psychology·2025
Same author

Editorial: Introduction to the special issue on cultural neuroscience.

Biological psychology·2023
Same author

Editorial: Generative artificial intelligence as a plagiarism problem.

Biological psychology·2023
Same author

Generative artificial intelligence in publishing - Reflection and discussion.

Biological psychology·2023
Same author

Biological Psychology, as it appears today: Tribute to the past, embrace of the future.

Biological psychology·2023
Same author

Handling EEG artifacts and searching individually optimal experimental parameter in real time: a system development and demonstration.

Journal of neural engineering·2021
Same journal

Your Heart Beats Next To Mine: Daily Physiological Synchrony Among Black And White ADRD Caregiver-Care Recipient Dyads.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Stimulus arousal level and savoring:an electrocortical investigation.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Neural Response to Reward and Pathological Personality Dimensions.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Early automatic and late lateralised top-down mechanisms for 3D perception.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Preliminary evidence for context-dependent modulation of interoceptive signals in social evaluation.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

How Do We Remember the Future? A Systematic Review of ERP Components in Focal and Nonfocal Prospective Memory Tasks.

Biological psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System
10:09

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System

Published on: October 1, 2019

6.6K

Multi-Algorithm Artifact Correction (MAAC) procedure part one: Algorithm and example.

Joseph Dien1

  • 1Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, 3304 Benjamin Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

Biological Psychology
|March 18, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Multi-Algorithm Artifact Correction (MAAC) procedure offers a novel approach to electroencephalographic (EEG) data by matching specific artifact correction methods to distinct artifact types, improving data quality.

Keywords:
ArtifactEEGERPOpen-source softwareStatistics

More Related Videos

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.9K
Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence
09:11

Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: January 27, 2023

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System
10:09

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System

Published on: October 1, 2019

6.6K
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.9K
Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence
09:11

Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: January 27, 2023

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Electroencephalography (EEG) is crucial for brain research but susceptible to artifacts.
  • Existing artifact correction methods (regression, spatial filters, PCA, ICA) have limitations.
  • No single method universally excels, highlighting the need for a tailored approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and advocate for the Multi-Algorithm Artifact Correction (MAAC) procedure for EEG data.
  • To present a conceptual framework for optimizing EEG artifact removal.
  • To demonstrate the MAAC procedure's implementation in the open-source EP Toolkit.

Main Methods:

  • Review of major EEG artifact correction techniques: regression, spatial filters, principal components analysis (PCA), and independent components analysis (ICA).
  • Categorization and review of common EEG artifact types: Blink, Corneo-Retinal Dipole, Saccadic Spike Potential, and Movement.
  • Development of the MAAC procedure by matching specific correction methods to individual artifact types.

Main Results:

  • Analysis indicates that different artifact correction methods possess unique strengths and weaknesses.
  • The MAAC procedure systematically pairs optimal correction algorithms with specific artifact types.
  • The MAAC procedure is implemented and available within the EP Toolkit.

Conclusions:

  • A hybrid approach, like MAAC, is superior to relying on a single artifact correction method.
  • Tailoring correction methods to artifact types enhances the accuracy and reliability of EEG data.
  • The MAAC procedure provides a flexible and effective strategy for improving EEG signal quality.