A phase Ib study evaluating the recommended phase II dose, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of mivavotinib in

Dejan Juric1, Minal Barve2, Ulka Vaishampayan3

  • 1Termeer Center for Targeted Therapies, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Cancer Medicine
|March 19, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Mivavotinib combined with nivolumab showed a tolerable safety profile in advanced solid tumors. However, the combination demonstrated low response rates, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer, indicating challenges for this immunotherapy approach.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunotherapy
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Mivavotinib is a dual SYK/FLT3 inhibitor with preclinical anti-tumor activity.
  • Combination with anti-PD-1 therapy has shown potential in reducing tumor-associated immunosuppression.
  • Investigating novel combinations is crucial for improving outcomes in advanced solid tumors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of mivavotinib plus nivolumab.
  • To determine the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of the combination therapy.
  • To evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Main Methods:

  • A dose-escalation/expansion study design was employed.
  • Patients received escalating doses of oral mivavotinib (60-100 mg daily) with intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks).
  • Primary endpoints included RP2D determination and ORR in TNBC patients.

Main Results:

  • The recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) was determined to be mivavotinib 80 mg once daily plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg.
  • Common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included dyspnea and elevated liver enzymes; Grade ≥3 TEAEs included hypophosphatemia and anemia.
  • The expansion phase for TNBC was terminated early due to futility; only one partial response was observed across all patients.

Conclusions:

  • Mivavotinib 80 mg plus nivolumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile, with no new safety signals identified.
  • The combination therapy showed limited efficacy, with low response rates in patients with advanced solid tumors, including TNBC.
  • These findings suggest challenges in treating unresponsive tumor types with this specific combination and broader immunotherapies.

Related Concept Videos

Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.3K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.7K
Cancer Therapies02:49

Cancer Therapies

Cancer therapies are various modes of treatment, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy that are administered to cancer patients.
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
7.7K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
2.9K
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists01:28

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists

Neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptors are distributed across the GI tract, vagal afferents, and key CNS regions including the central vomiting center and chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ) Chemotherapy agents stimulate enterochromaffin cells in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to release large amounts of substance P (SP). SP is a neuropeptide released by specific sensory nerves in response to many different stressors, including those in the GI mucosa affected by chemotherapy.  SP binds and activates...
162
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists01:29

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists

Dopamine receptor antagonists, also known as antipsychotic agents, are critical in managing chemotherapy-induced vomiting. These antiemetic agents block dopamine receptors in the chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ), inhibiting signal transmission to the vomiting center. Antipsychotic agents encompass phenothiazines (PTZ), butyrophenones, benzamides, and thienobenzodiazepines (Zyprexa), which are utilized for their antiemetic and sedative properties.
Phenothiazines, such as prochlorperazine...
288