Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
A phase Ib study evaluating the recommended phase II dose, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of mivavotinib in
Dejan Juric1, Minal Barve2, Ulka Vaishampayan3
1Termeer Center for Targeted Therapies, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract:
Mivavotinib (TAK-659/CB-659), a dual SYK/FLT3 inhibitor, reduced immunosuppressive immune cell populations and suppressed tumor growth in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy in cancer models. This dose-escalation/expansion study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of mivavotinib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received oral mivavotinib 60-100 mg once-daily plus intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dose-escalation phase evaluated the recommended phase II dose (RP2D; primary endpoint). The expansion phase evaluated overall response rate (primary end point) at the RP2D in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). During dose-escalation (n = 24), two dose-limiting toxicities (grade 4 lipase increased and grade 3 pyrexia) occurred in patients who received mivavotinib 80 mg and 100 mg, respectively. The determined RP2D was once-daily mivavotinib 80 mg plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg. The expansion phase was terminated at ~50% enrollment (n = 17) after failing to meet an ad hoc efficacy futility threshold. Among all 41 patients, common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included dyspnea (48.8%), aspartate aminotransferase increased, and pyrexia (46.3% each). Common grade ≥3 TEAEs were hypophosphatemia and anemia (26.8% each). Mivavotinib plasma exposure was generally dose-proportional (60-100 mg). One patient had a partial response. Mivavotinib 80 mg plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg was well tolerated with no new safety signals beyond those of single-agent mivavotinib or nivolumab. Low response rates highlight the challenges of treating unresponsive tumor types, such as TNBC, with this combination and immunotherapies in general. TRIAL REGISTRATION ID: NCT02834247.
Insights
Mivavotinib combined with nivolumab showed a tolerable safety profile in advanced solid tumors. However, the combination demonstrated low response rates, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer, indicating challenges for this immunotherapy approach.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Mivavotinib is a dual SYK/FLT3 inhibitor with preclinical anti-tumor activity.
- Combination with anti-PD-1 therapy has shown potential in reducing tumor-associated immunosuppression.
- Investigating novel combinations is crucial for improving outcomes in advanced solid tumors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of mivavotinib plus nivolumab.
- To determine the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of the combination therapy.
- To evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
Main Methods:
- A dose-escalation/expansion study design was employed.
- Patients received escalating doses of oral mivavotinib (60-100 mg daily) with intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks).
- Primary endpoints included RP2D determination and ORR in TNBC patients.
Main Results:
- The recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) was determined to be mivavotinib 80 mg once daily plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg.
- Common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included dyspnea and elevated liver enzymes; Grade ≥3 TEAEs included hypophosphatemia and anemia.
- The expansion phase for TNBC was terminated early due to futility; only one partial response was observed across all patients.
Conclusions:
- Mivavotinib 80 mg plus nivolumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile, with no new safety signals identified.
- The combination therapy showed limited efficacy, with low response rates in patients with advanced solid tumors, including TNBC.
- These findings suggest challenges in treating unresponsive tumor types with this specific combination and broader immunotherapies.
More Related Videos
06:15Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
10:18Author Spotlight: Magnetic Fluorescent Bead-Based Dual-Reporter Flow Analysis of PDL1-Vaxx Peptide Vaccine-Induced Antibody Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 Interaction
Published on: July 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Phenothiazines, such as prochlorperazine...