Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Perioperative Treatment with Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran on Changes of Coagulation and Platelet Activation Biomarkers
Yao Yao1, Yanli Li1, Qinchun Jin2
1Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Abstract:
Insufficient data exist regarding the investigation of the impact of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) on coagulation activation biomarkers in the context of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and device-related thrombosis (DRT). The study was designed to investigate the changes and presence of coagulation activation biomarkers between different antithrombotic strategies following LAAC. A total of 120 nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients intolerant of long-term anticoagulants, who underwent successful WATCHMAN closure implantation, were enrolled (rivaroxaban, n = 82; dabigatran, n = 38). Blood samples were obtained from left atrium (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) during the operation and fasting blood samples on the same day of LAAC and 45 days after discharge. The biochemical indicators, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin), von Willebrand factor (vWF), and CD40 ligand (CD40L), were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The primary endpoints of this study were the efficacy and safety characteristics of different antithrombotic strategies, including DRT incidence, stroke or transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, and clinical major and nonmajor bleeding complications during the follow-up of 180 days. The results revealed that TAT, vWF, sP-selectin, and CD40L levels in vein were significantly reduced by 2.4% (p = 0.043), 5.0% (p < 0.001), 8.7% (p < 0.001), and 2.5% (p = 0.043) from their baseline levels after rivaroxaban treatment. Conversely, no significant changes were detected in the dabigatran group. Furthermore, the plasma levels of platelet activation biomarkers (CD40L and sP-selectin) in both LA and LAA groups were significantly lower after anticoagulation with rivaroxaban, as compared to dabigatran treatment (CD40L: 554.62 ± 155.54 vs. 445.02 ± 130.04 for LA p = 0.0013, 578.51 ± 156.28 vs. 480.13 ± 164.37 for LAA p = 0.0052; sP-selectin: 2849.07 ± 846.69 vs. 2225.54 ± 799.96 for LA p = 0.0105, 2915.52 ± 1402.40 vs. 2203.41 ± 1061.67 for LAA p = 0.0022). Notably, the present study suggests that rivaroxaban may be more effective in the prevention of DRT for patients undergoing LAAC.
Insights
Rivaroxaban significantly reduced coagulation activation biomarkers after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), unlike dabigatran. This suggests rivaroxaban may offer better prevention of device-related thrombosis (DRT) in LAAC patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hematology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) impact on coagulation biomarkers post-left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is understudied.
- Device-related thrombosis (DRT) is a complication following LAAC.
- Understanding biomarker changes with different antithrombotic strategies is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate changes in coagulation activation biomarkers with different antithrombotic strategies after LAAC.
- To compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus dabigatran in patients undergoing LAAC.
- To assess the potential of rivaroxaban in preventing DRT.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 120 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation undergoing LAAC with WATCHMAN closure.
- Patients received either rivaroxaban (n=82) or dabigatran (n=38).
- Coagulation biomarkers (TAT, sP-selectin, vWF, CD40L) were measured via ELISA in blood samples from LA and LAA during operation and post-discharge.
Main Results:
- Rivaroxaban significantly reduced TAT, vWF, sP-selectin, and CD40L levels post-treatment (p<0.05).
- No significant changes in these biomarkers were observed with dabigatran.
- Plasma levels of platelet activation biomarkers (CD40L, sP-selectin) were significantly lower with rivaroxaban compared to dabigatran in both LA and LAA groups (p<0.013).
Conclusions:
- Rivaroxaban demonstrates a more favorable effect on coagulation activation biomarkers compared to dabigatran after LAAC.
- These findings suggest rivaroxaban may be more effective in preventing device-related thrombosis (DRT) in patients undergoing LAAC.
- Further research is warranted to confirm the clinical implications of these biomarker changes.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Formation of the Platelet Plug
As the injured blood vessel contracts, endothelial cells undergo contraction, revealing collagen fibers in the basement membrane and underlying connective tissue. Furthermore, the plasma membrane of endothelial cells becomes adhesive, preparing the site for platelet adhesion. Platelets...

