Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction for Hepatic Steatosis Assessment: Prospective Study of Agreement With MRI PDFF and...

BACKGROUND. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease is a growing global public health concern. Quantitative ultrasound measurements, such as ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF), could provide noninvasive, cost-effective, and portable steatosis evaluation. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to evaluate utility of UDFF for steatosis assessment using proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as reference in patients undergoing liver MRI for heterogeneous indications and to assess UDFF variability. METHODS. This prospective study included a primary analysis of 187 patients (mean age, 53.8 years; 112 men, 75 women) who underwent 3-T liver MRI for any clinical indication from December 2020 to July 2021. Patients underwent investigational PDFF measurement, including determination of PDFF_whole-liver (mean PDFF of entire liver), and PDFF_voxel (PDFF in single voxel within right lobe, measured by MR spectroscopy), as well as investigational ultrasound with UDFF calculation (mean of five inter-costal measurements) within 1 hour after MRI. In a subanalysis, 21 of these patients underwent additional UDFF measurements 1, 3, and 5 hours after meal consumption. The study also included repeatability and reproducibility analysis of 30 patients (mean age, 26.3 years; 10 men, 20 women) who underwent clinical abdominal ultrasound between November 2022 and January 2023; in these patients, three operators sequentially performed UDFF measurements. RESULTS. In primary analysis, UDFF and PDFF_whole-liver measurements showed intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.79. In Bland-Altman analysis, UDFF and PDFF_voxel measurements showed mean difference of 1.5% (95% CI, 0.6-2.4%), with 95% limits of agreement from -11.0% to 14.0%. UDFF measurements exhibited AUC for detecting PDFF_voxel at historic thresholds of 6.5% and greater, 17.4% and greater, and 22.1% and greater of 0.90, 0.95, and 0.95, respectively. In subanalysis, mean UDFF was not significantly different across time points with respect to meal consumption (p = .21). In repeatability and reproducibility analysis, ICC for intraoperator repeatability ranged from 0.98 to 0.99 and for interoperator reproducibility from 0.90 to 0.96. Visual assessment of patient-level data plots indicated increasing variability of mean UDFF measurements across operators and of intercostal measurements within individual patients with increasing steatosis. CONCLUSION. UDFF showed robust agreement with PDFF, diagnostic performance for steatosis grades, and intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility. Nonetheless, UDFF exhibited bias toward slightly larger values versus PDFF; intraoperator and interoperator variation increased with increasing steatosis. CLINICAL IMPACT. UDFF shows promise for steatosis assessment across diverse populations, although continued optimization remains warranted.