Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

A Protocol for Explant Cultures of IDH1-mutant Diffuse Low-grade Gliomas
Published on: May 9, 2025
Differentiation syndrome associated with treatment with IDH2 inhibitor enasidenib: pooled analysis from clinical
Pau Montesinos1, Amir T Fathi2, Stéphane de Botton3
1Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Abstract:
Treatment with enasidenib, a selective mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase isoform 2 (IDH2) inhibitor, has been associated with the development of differentiation syndrome (DS) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Studies on the incidence and clinical features of DS are limited in this setting, and diagnosis is challenging because of nonspecific symptoms. This study assessed the incidence, diagnostic criteria, risk factors, and correlation with clinical response of DS based on the pooled analysis of 4 clinical trials in patients with IDH2-mutated AML treated with enasidenib as monotherapy, or in combination with azacitidine or with chemotherapy. Across the total AML population, 67 of 643 (10.4%) had ≥1 any-grade DS event, with highest incidence in patients who received enasidenib plus azacitidine and lowest incidence in patients who received enasidenib plus chemotherapy (13/74 [17.6%] and 2/93 [2.2%]). The most common symptoms of DS were dyspnea/hypoxia (80.6%) and pulmonary infiltrate (73.1%). Median time to onset of first DS event across all studies was 32 days (range, 4-129). Most patients (88.1%) received systemic steroids for treatment of DS. Evaluation of baseline risk factors for DS identified higher levels of bone marrow blasts and lactate dehydrogenase as independent factors associated with increased grade 3 to 5 DS risk. Overall, these results suggest that DS associated with IDH inhibition is manageable, given the benefits of enasidenib treatment in IDH2-mutated AML. We further characterized enasidenib-related DS in these patients and identified risk factors, which could be used for DS management in clinical practice. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as # NCT01915498, NCT02577406, NCT02677922, and NCT02632708.
Insights
Differentiation syndrome (DS) occurred in 10.4% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients treated with enasidenib. Higher bone marrow blasts and LDH levels were risk factors, but DS is manageable with enasidenib for IDH2-mutated AML.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Enasidenib, an IDH2 inhibitor, is used for acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
- Differentiation syndrome (DS) is a known complication of enasidenib treatment.
- Limited data exists on DS incidence, features, and risk factors in IDH2-mutated AML patients receiving enasidenib.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the incidence, diagnostic criteria, risk factors, and clinical response correlation of DS.
- To evaluate DS in patients with IDH2-mutated AML treated with enasidenib (monotherapy or combination therapy).
Main Methods:
- Pooled analysis of 4 clinical trials involving patients with IDH2-mutated AML.
- Patients received enasidenib as monotherapy, or in combination with azacitidine or chemotherapy.
- Incidence, symptoms, time to onset, treatment, and risk factors for DS were analyzed.
Main Results:
- DS occurred in 10.4% of AML patients (67/643), with highest incidence with enasidenib plus azacitidine (17.6%) and lowest with enasidenib plus chemotherapy (2.2%).
- Common DS symptoms included dyspnea/hypoxia (80.6%) and pulmonary infiltrate (73.1%). Median time to onset was 32 days.
- Higher bone marrow blasts and lactate dehydrogenase levels were independent risk factors for grade 3-5 DS. Systemic steroids were used in 88.1% of cases.
Conclusions:
- Differentiation syndrome associated with IDH inhibition is manageable in IDH2-mutated AML.
- Identified risk factors can aid in DS management in clinical practice.
- Enasidenib treatment offers benefits for IDH2-mutated AML despite DS risk.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
iPS Cell Differentiation
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...

