Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Published on: November 10, 2023
Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection at a UK electricity-generating company: a test-negative design case-control
Charlotte E Rutter1, Martie van Tongeren2,3, Tony Fletcher4
1Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK charlotte.rutter1@lshtm.ac.uk.
Workplace risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) infection were studied in UK electricity workers. Infection risk was not linked to job type but was higher during site outages and for symptomatic testing.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health
- Epidemiology
- Infectious Disease Surveillance
Background:
- Understanding workplace transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for public health interventions.
- The electricity-generating sector presents unique occupational settings with potential for varied exposure risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify specific workplace risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees in a UK electricity-generating company.
- To analyze the influence of job category, site characteristics, testing reasons, and other variables on infection risk.
Main Methods:
- A test-negative design case-control study was employed, analyzing COVID-19 test data from company employees.
- Odds ratios (OR) for infection were estimated by job category, site, test reason, sex, vaccination status, vulnerability, site outage, and site COVID-19 risk rating.
- Adjustments were made for age, test date, and test type to control for confounding factors.
Main Results:
- Out of 80,077 initial tests, 70,646 were included. Symptomatic testing (OR=94.99) and close contact testing (OR=16.73) showed significantly higher positivity rates compared to routine testing.
- While most job categories showed similar risk, specific sites exhibited notably lower (three sites) or higher (one site) infection risks.
- Women were less likely to test positive than men (OR=0.71).
Conclusions:
- Job category was not a significant predictor of SARS-CoV-2 infection risk.
- Increased risk was observed during site outages and for symptomatic individuals. Vulnerable individuals had slightly lower risk.
- Vaccination status did not demonstrate a clear effect on testing positive, and site COVID-19 risk ratings did not correlate with positivity trends.
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Generator Voltage Control
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Household Wiring And Electrical Safety

