Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila
Published on: August 20, 2019
Explicable prioritization of genetic variants by integration of rule-based and machine learning algorithms for
Ho Heon Kim1, Dong-Wook Kim1, Junwoo Woo1
1Research and Development Center, 3billion, 14th floor, 416 Teheran-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06193, Republic of Korea.
Background:
In the process of finding the causative variant of rare diseases, accurate assessment and prioritization of genetic variants is essential. Previous variant prioritization tools mainly depend on the in-silico prediction of the pathogenicity of variants, which results in low sensitivity and difficulty in interpreting the prioritization result. In this study, we propose an explainable algorithm for variant prioritization, named 3ASC, with higher sensitivity and ability to annotate evidence used for prioritization. 3ASC annotates each variant with the 28 criteria defined by the ACMG/AMP genome interpretation guidelines and features related to the clinical interpretation of the variants. The system can explain the result based on annotated evidence and feature contributions.
Results:
We trained various machine learning algorithms using in-house patient data. The performance of variant ranking was assessed using the recall rate of identifying causative variants in the top-ranked variants. The best practice model was a random forest classifier that showed top 1 recall of 85.6% and top 3 recall of 94.4%. The 3ASC annotates the ACMG/AMP criteria for each genetic variant of a patient so that clinical geneticists can interpret the result as in the CAGI6 SickKids challenge. In the challenge, 3ASC identified causal genes for 10 out of 14 patient cases, with evidence of decreased gene expression for 6 cases. Among them, two genes (HDAC8 and CASK) had decreased gene expression profiles confirmed by transcriptome data.
Conclusions:
3ASC can prioritize genetic variants with higher sensitivity compared to previous methods by integrating various features related to clinical interpretation, including features related to false positive risk such as quality control and disease inheritance pattern. The system allows interpretation of each variant based on the ACMG/AMP criteria and feature contribution assessed using explainable AI techniques.
More Related Videos
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
09:37Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information
Published on: August 15, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Incomplete Dominance
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Pedigree Analysis
Probability Laws