Derivation and validation of predictive indices for cardiac readmission after coronary and valvular surgery - A

Louise Y Sun1,2, Anna Chu2, Derrick Y Tam2,3,4

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Insights

New models can predict one-year cardiac readmission risk after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement (AVR), or combined procedures. These models utilize readily available electronic health record data for improved patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Health Informatics
  • Predictive Analytics

Background:

  • Cardiac surgery patients face significant risks of readmission.
  • Accurate prediction of readmission is crucial for resource allocation and patient management.
  • Existing models often lack generalizability or utilize limited data sources.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate predictive models for one-year cardiac readmission risk.
  • To utilize routinely collected electronic medical record data for model derivation.
  • To assess model performance after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement (AVR), and combined CABG+AVR.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study using Canadian clinical registries and administrative databases.
  • Development of Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models within a competing-risk framework.
  • External validation of models in an independent patient cohort.

Main Results:

  • Models demonstrated good predictive performance: c-statistics ranged from 0.66 to 0.74.
  • Post-CABG model: c-statistic 0.73 (derivation), 0.70 (validation).
  • Post-AVR model: c-statistic 0.74 (derivation), 0.73 (validation).
  • Post-CABG+AVR model: c-statistic 0.70 (derivation), 0.66 (validation).

Conclusions:

  • Predicting one-year cardiac readmission after CABG, AVR, and combined procedures is feasible using multidimensional data.
  • The derived models show improved discrimination compared to existing registry-based models.
  • These models offer a parsimonious yet effective tool for risk stratification.
Abstract