Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Establishing 3-Dimensional Spheroids from Patient-Derived Tumor Samples and Evaluating their Sensitivity to Drugs
Published on: December 16, 2022
PACE: A Randomized Phase II Study of Fulvestrant, Palbociclib, and Avelumab After Progression on Cyclin-Dependent
Erica L Mayer1,2, Yue Ren3, Nikhil Wagle1,2
1Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Purpose:
Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) are an important component of treatment for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but it is not known if patients might derive benefit from continuation of CDK4/6i with endocrine therapy beyond initial tumor progression or if the addition of checkpoint inhibitor therapy has value in this setting.
Methods:
The randomized multicenter phase II PACE trial enrolled patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2- MBC whose disease had progressed on previous CDK4/6i and aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:2:1 to receive fulvestrant (F), fulvestrant plus palbociclib (F + P), or fulvestrant plus palbociclib and avelumab (F + P + A). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with F versus F + P.
Results:
Overall, 220 patients were randomly assigned between September 2017 and February 2022. The median age was 57 years (range, 25-83 years). Most patients were postmenopausal (80.9%), and 40% were originally diagnosed with de novo MBC. Palbociclib was the most common previous CDK4/6i (90.9%). The median PFS was 4.8 months on F and 4.6 months on F + P (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [90% CI, 0.79 to 1.55]; P = .62). The median PFS on F + P + A was 8.1 months (HR v F, 0.75 [90% CI, 0.50 to 1.12]; P = .23). The difference in PFS with F + P and F + P + A versus F was greater among patients with baseline ESR1 and PIK3CA alterations.
Conclusion:
The addition of palbociclib to fulvestrant did not improve PFS versus fulvestrant alone among patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2- MBC whose disease had progressed on a previous CDK4/6i plus AI. The increased PFS seen with the addition of avelumab warrants further investigation in this patient population.
Insights
Adding palbociclib to fulvestrant did not improve progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer patients who progressed on prior therapies. However, adding avelumab showed promising PFS, warranting further study.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Therapeutics
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are standard for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
- Optimal treatment strategies beyond initial progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors remain an area of investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of continuing CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy post-progression.
- To assess the value of adding checkpoint inhibitors in this setting.
Main Methods:
- The randomized multicenter phase II PACE trial enrolled patients with HER2- MBC progressing on CDK4/6i and aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy.
- Patients received fulvestrant (F), fulvestrant plus palbociclib (F + P), or fulvestrant plus palbociclib and avelumab (F + P + A).
- The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) comparing F versus F + P.
Main Results:
- Continuation of palbociclib with fulvestrant (F + P) did not significantly improve PFS compared to fulvestrant alone (median PFS 4.6 vs. 4.8 months).
- The addition of avelumab to fulvestrant plus palbociclib (F + P + A) resulted in a median PFS of 8.1 months, showing a trend towards improvement versus fulvestrant alone.
- Benefit was more pronounced in patients with baseline ESR1 and PIK3CA alterations.
Conclusions:
- Adding palbociclib to fulvestrant does not improve PFS in patients with HER2- MBC after progression on prior CDK4/6i and AI therapy.
- The addition of avelumab demonstrated a potential benefit in PFS, meriting further investigation in this patient population.
More Related Videos
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
14:20Polymalic Acid-based Nano Biopolymers for Targeting of Multiple Tumor Markers: An Opportunity for Personalized Medicine?
Published on: June 13, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...