Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Karyotyping01:17

Karyotyping

Describing the number and physical features of chromosomes can reveal abnormalities that underlie genetic diseases. This description is facilitated by special staining techniques that produce a particular banding pattern on each chromosome. State-of-the-art techniques make this approach even more powerful, enabling the detection of individual genes that cause disease.A Simple Chromosome Staining Technique Provides Valuable Scientific InsightSome genetic diseases can be detected by looking at...
Classification of Connective Tissues01:30

Classification of Connective Tissues

The connective tissues have different properties and functions in the human body. They are broadly categorized into proper, supporting, or fluid connective tissues.
Connective Tissue Proper
Connective tissue proper is the most abundant class of connective tissues. As its name implies, it predominantly connects different tissues in the body. Depending on the cell types, ground substance, viscosity, and fiber types in the ECM, connective tissue proper is further categorized into loose and dense.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Water-Mediated Ion Selectivity in 2D MXene Channels.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Malignant Transformation and Progression of Musculoskeletal Lesions with Imaging-Pathology Correlation-Part 2: Soft Tissue Lesions.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

A modified Delphi consensus on tenosynovial giant cell tumour and giant cell tumour of bone : a report from the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM).

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Enhanced exosomes for fertility protection against chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage.

NPJ Regenerative medicine·2026
Same author

Complications of PI to PIII hemipelvic resections for intermediate and malignant tumours : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same author

Iodoacetic acid causes developmental toxicity in zebrafish.

Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Methyl-binding DNA capture Sequencing for Patient Tissues
08:40

Methyl-binding DNA capture Sequencing for Patient Tissues

Published on: October 31, 2016

8.6K

Can DNA Methylation Profiling Classify Histologic Subtypes and Grades in Soft Tissue Sarcoma?

Hyunho Kim1, Min Wook Joo2, Joohee Yoon3

  • 1Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|March 22, 2024
PubMed
Summary

DNA methylation profiles differ between soft tissue sarcoma and normal tissue, and vary by subtype and grade. This epigenetic profiling can aid in diagnosing soft tissue sarcomas and understanding their diverse biological characteristics.

More Related Videos

LINE-1 Methylation Analysis in Mesenchymal Stem Cells Treated with Osteosarcoma-Derived Extracellular Vesicles
12:18

LINE-1 Methylation Analysis in Mesenchymal Stem Cells Treated with Osteosarcoma-Derived Extracellular Vesicles

Published on: February 1, 2020

5.8K
Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer
07:50

Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer

Published on: September 18, 2020

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Methyl-binding DNA capture Sequencing for Patient Tissues
08:40

Methyl-binding DNA capture Sequencing for Patient Tissues

Published on: October 31, 2016

8.6K
LINE-1 Methylation Analysis in Mesenchymal Stem Cells Treated with Osteosarcoma-Derived Extracellular Vesicles
12:18

LINE-1 Methylation Analysis in Mesenchymal Stem Cells Treated with Osteosarcoma-Derived Extracellular Vesicles

Published on: February 1, 2020

5.8K
Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer
07:50

Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer

Published on: September 18, 2020

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Epigenetics
  • Oncology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Accurate classification of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) subtypes and grades is crucial for prognosis and treatment.
  • The rarity and heterogeneity of STS present diagnostic challenges and difficulties in predicting treatment response.
  • Current diagnostic methods need complementary approaches, as genetic alterations are not found in all STS, while epigenetic changes like DNA methylation are increasingly recognized.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate differences in DNA methylation profiles between normal tissue and soft tissue sarcoma.
  • To determine if DNA methylation profiles vary across different histologic subtypes of soft tissue sarcoma.
  • To assess whether DNA methylation profiles differ based on tumor grade in soft tissue sarcoma.

Main Methods:

  • DNA methylation profiling was performed on 34 soft tissue sarcoma specimens and five normal muscle tissue samples.
  • Genomic annotation and hierarchical cluster analysis were used to interpret DNA methylation profiling results.
  • Statistical analyses, including t-tests and Benjamini-Hochberg correction, were applied to identify significant methylation differences.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences in DNA methylation were observed between soft tissue sarcoma and normal tissues, with 70 out of 72 differentially methylated sites showing hypermethylation in tumors.
  • DNA methylation profiling distinguished liposarcoma from leiomyosarcoma, and high-grade sarcomas (Grades 2 and 3) showed distinct hypermethylation patterns compared to low-grade (Grade 1) tumors.
  • Hierarchical clustering successfully separated most high-grade sarcomas from low-grade ones, and Grade 3 tumors were distinct from Grades 1 and 2.

Conclusions:

  • DNA methylation patterns differ significantly between soft tissue sarcomas and normal tissues, offering potential diagnostic utility.
  • Methylation profiling can differentiate between specific soft tissue sarcoma subtypes (e.g., liposarcoma vs. leiomyosarcoma) and grades.
  • Further research with larger sample sizes and diverse subtypes is warranted to explore the clinical implications of DNA methylation in soft tissue sarcoma diagnosis and treatment.