Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

10:35
Vector Competence Analyses on Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes using Zika Virus
Published on: May 31, 2020
3.0K
Assessing vulnerability for future Zika virus outbreaks using seroprevalence data and environmental suitability maps
Yannik Roell1, Laura Pezzi2,3, Anyela Lozano-Parra4
1Center for Global Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases
|March 22, 2024
Summary
Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreaks may reoccur, as many populations show high vulnerability. Comparing environmental suitability with observed immunity reveals significant discrepancies, indicating a potential risk for future ZIKV epidemics.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Public Health
- Environmental Health
Background:
- The 2015-17 Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemic in the Americas ended unexpectedly, with evolving population immunity hypothesized as the cause.
- Herd immunity, typically achieved at 60-70% seroprevalence, was only observed in limited South American areas, suggesting widespread vulnerability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess population vulnerability to ZIKV by comparing environmental suitability for transmission with documented seroprevalence.
- To identify geographic areas at high risk for future ZIKV outbreaks based on observed-expected seroprevalence discrepancies.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search identified 119 locations with seroprevalence and geospatial data from 37 studies.
- Environmental suitability for ZIKV transmission was assessed for each location.
- Observed seroprevalence was compared to a hypothetical expected seroprevalence to determine vulnerability levels (high, low, very low risk).
Main Results:
- Of 119 locations, 69 (58%) were categorized as high risk, 47 (39%) as low risk, and 3 (3%) as very low risk for ZIKV outbreaks.
- Significant heterogeneity exists between environmental suitability and observed seroprevalence, indicating potential population vulnerability.
- Vulnerability was particularly noted in areas at the environmental suitability fringes, such as Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Conclusions:
- Discrepancies between expected and observed ZIKV seroprevalence suggest large populations remain vulnerable to future outbreaks.
- The reasons for the rapid subsidence of the ZIKV epidemic despite unaffected populations remain unclear.
- Predicting future ZIKV outbreaks with confidence is challenging due to the current lack of understanding regarding epidemic dynamics and population immunity.

