Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

00:05
In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
Published on: August 28, 2019
13.9K
Research on aquatic microcosm: Bibliometric analysis, toxicity comparison and model prediction
Fan Wu1, Zhengtao Liu1, Jiaqi Wang1
1State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, PR China.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
|March 22, 2024
Summary
Aquatic microcosm research trends show a focus on ecological processes and pollutant impacts. Microcosm tests reveal significant differences compared to single-species assessments, aiding ecological risk evaluations.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Ecotoxicology
- Ecosystem Modeling
Background:
- Aquatic microcosms are valuable tools for simulating natural aquatic ecosystems.
- Bibliometric analysis reveals trends, hotspots, and international collaborations in aquatic microcosm research.
- Research spans ecological processes, ecosystem services, and pollutant toxicity/degradation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the historical development and current landscape of aquatic microcosm research.
- To compare single-species toxicity tests with microcosm tests for ecological risk assessment.
- To develop predictive models for microcosm toxicity values.
Main Methods:
- Bibliometric analysis of 1841 articles published between 1962 and 2022.
- Comparison of aquatic safety thresholds (NOECcommunity, HC5, PNEC) from single-species and microcosm tests.
- Construction of regression models to predict microcosm toxicity.
Main Results:
- The United States and China are leading countries in aquatic microcosm research publications.
- Significant differences were observed between community-level no-effect concentration (NOECcommunity) and hazardous concentration for 5% of species (HC5).
- Predictive models for microcosm toxicity were developed.
Conclusions:
- Aquatic microcosm research is evolving, with distinct phases focusing on ecological functions and pollutant impacts.
- Microcosm tests provide a different tier of assessment compared to single-species tests, highlighting the importance of community-level effects.
- The developed models offer a valuable reference for ecological risk assessments using aquatic microcosms.
Related Concept Videos
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
Marine Microbial Ecology
Marine microbial ecosystems are shaped by distinct physicochemical limits, including high salinity, low nutrient availability, and fluctuating oxygen levels. These conditions favor smaller microbial cell sizes, which maximize their surface-to-volume ratio for efficient nutrient uptake.Microbial activity and community composition are closely linked to biogeochemical cycles, particularly in dynamic environments like estuaries, where halotolerant microbes thrive in response to variable salinity...
Freshwater Microbial Ecology
Freshwater systems such as streams, rivers, and lakes exhibit distinct physical and biological characteristics that influence their microbial communities. These environments are broadly categorized into lotic systems—those with flowing waters like streams and most rivers—and lentic systems, which include still or slow-moving waters such as lakes, ponds, and marshes.In lentic systems, phytoplankton drive primary production, generating autochthonous organic carbon. In contrast, lotic systems...

