Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual load does not modulate neural processing of audiovisual speech integration.

Neuropsychologia·2025
Same author

Movement-related cortical potential and speech-induced suppression during speech production in younger and older adults.

Brain and language·2024
Same author

Competing influence of visual speech on auditory neural adaptation.

Brain and language·2023
Same author

The timing of visual speech modulates auditory neural processing.

Brain and language·2022
Same author

Motor and visual influences on auditory neural processing during speaking and listening.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2022
Same author

How are visemes and graphemes integrated with speech sounds during spoken word recognition? ERP evidence for supra-additive responses during audiovisual compared to auditory speech processing.

Brain and language·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2025

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
12:43

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS

Published on: February 21, 2011

34.8K

Audiovisual speech asynchrony asymmetrically modulates neural binding.

Marc Sato1

  • 1Laboratoire Parole et Langage, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Aix-Marseille Université, Aix-en-Provence, France.

Neuropsychologia
|March 22, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Audiovisual speech integration in adults shows an asymmetric temporal window. Predictive visual cues before sound onset are crucial for neural binding and auditory processing, operating in two predictive stages.

Keywords:
Audiovisual asynchronyAudiovisual speech integrationAudiovisual speech perceptionEEGTemporal integration window

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.5K
A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2025

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
12:43

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS

Published on: February 21, 2011

34.8K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.5K
A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Speech Processing

Background:

  • Previous studies indicate significant temporal tolerance in audiovisual speech integration in young adults.
  • Audiovisual speech processing involves complex neural mechanisms for binding auditory and visual information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how audiovisual speech asynchrony affects auditory cortical processing and neural binding.
  • To determine the temporal window and predictive mechanisms underlying audiovisual speech integration.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of N1/P2 auditory evoked responses using an additive model during a syllable categorization task.
  • Presentation of audiovisual stimuli with asynchrony ranging from 240 ms visual lead to 240 ms auditory lead.

Main Results:

  • Audiovisual integration exhibits an asymmetric temporal window, favoring visual leads.
  • Predictive visual cues preceding acoustic onset are essential for neural binding and N1 latency facilitation.
  • P2 responses showed amplitude suppression and latency facilitation even with non-predictive visual cues.

Conclusions:

  • Audiovisual speech integration operates in two stages, relying on visually-based temporal and phonetic predictions.
  • The timing and predictability of visual information significantly modulate auditory cortical responses and neural binding.