Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
Published on: December 18, 2016
Signatures of microstructure in gradient-echo and spin-echo signals
Pippa Storey1, Dmitry S Novikov1
1Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Purpose:
To determine whether the spatial scale and magnetic susceptibility of microstructure can be evaluated robustly from the decay of gradient-echo and spin-echo signals.
Theory And Methods:
Gradient-echo and spin-echo images were acquired from suspensions of spherical polystyrene microbeads of 10, 20, and 40 μm nominal diameter. The sizes of the beads and their magnetic susceptibility relative to the medium were estimated from the signal decay curves, using a lookup table generated from Monte Carlo simulations and an analytic model based on the Gaussian phase approximation.
Results:
Fitting Monte Carlo predictions to spin-echo data yielded acceptable estimates of microstructural parameters for the 20 and 40 μm microbeads. Using gradient-echo data, the Monte Carlo lookup table provided satisfactory parameter estimates for the 20 μm beads but unstable results for the diameter of the largest beads. Neither spin-echo nor gradient-echo data allowed accurate parameter estimation for the smallest beads. The analytic model performed poorly over all bead sizes.
Conclusions:
Microstructural sources of magnetic susceptibility produce distinctive non-exponential signatures in the decay of gradient-echo and spin-echo signals. However, inverting the problem to extract microstructural parameters from the signals is nontrivial and, in certain regimes, ill-conditioned. For microstructure with small characteristic length scales, parameter estimation is hampered by the difficulty of acquiring accurate data at very short echo times. For microstructure with large characteristic lengths, the gradient-echo signal approaches the static-dephasing regime, where it becomes insensitive to size. Applicability of the analytic model was further limited by failure of the Gaussian phase approximation for all but the smallest beads.
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule
NMR Spectrometers: Radiofrequency Pulses and Pulse Sequences
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction
¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...

