Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Automated, High-resolution Mobile Collection System for the Nitrogen Isotopic Analysis of NOx
Published on: December 20, 2016
Predicting particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone across Great Britain with high spatiotemporal resolution
Jiaxin Chen1, Shengqiang Zhu2, Peng Wang3
1School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education and Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of the Ministry of Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Abstract:
In Great Britain, limited studies have employed machine learning methods to predict air pollution especially ozone (O3) with high spatiotemporal resolution. This study aimed to address this gap by developing random forest models for four key pollutants (fine and inhalable particulate matter [PM2.5 and PM10], nitrogen dioxide [NO2] and O3) by integrating multiple-source predictors at a daily level and 1-km resolution. The out-of-bag R2 (root mean squared error, RMSE) between predictions from models and measurements from monitoring stations in 2006-2013 was 0.85 (3.63 μg/m3) for PM2.5, 0.77 (6.00 μg/m3) for PM10, 0.85 (9.71 μg/m3) for NO2, and 0.85 (9.39 μg/m3) for maximum daily 8-h average (MDA8) O3 at daily level, and the predicting accuracy was higher at monthly and annual level. The high-resolution predictions captured characterized spatiotemporal patterns of the four pollutants. Higher concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 were distributed in densely populated southern regions of Great Britain while O3 showed an inverse spatial pattern in general, which could not be fully depicted by monitoring stations. Therefore, predictions produced in this study could improve exposure assessment with less exposure misclassification and flexible exposure windows for future epidemiological studies to investigate the impact of air pollution across Great Britain.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Random Error
Precipitation Processes
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...

