Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Fused Filament Fabrication FFF of Metal-Ceramic Components
Published on: January 11, 2019
Identifying uncertainty in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing models
Felipe Lopez1, Paul Witherell2, Brandon Lane3
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712.
This study addresses uncertainty in additive manufacturing (AM) models, specifically for laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF). It identifies uncertainty sources and proposes methods to quantify and reduce it for improved part qualification and process control.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science and Engineering
- Computational Modeling and Simulation
- Manufacturing Processes
Background:
- Additive manufacturing (AM) models are crucial for design and process planning but often lack precision and accuracy information.
- Model uncertainty is critical for validating AM models, qualifying parts, and managing process variability.
- Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) is a key AM technology where model uncertainty significantly impacts outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss the origins and propagation of uncertainty in L-PBF models.
- To present techniques for quantifying uncertainty from various sources.
- To explore methods for reducing prediction uncertainty using online measurements.
Main Methods:
- Identification of four primary uncertainty sources: modeling assumptions, unknown simulation parameters, numerical approximations, and calibration data measurement error.
- Brief presentation of techniques to quantify uncertainty for each identified source.
- Development and application of estimation algorithms to reduce prediction uncertainty with online measurements.
Main Results:
- Quantification of model uncertainty for single-track experiments in L-PBF.
- Simulation-based study of online estimation's effect on overhanging structures.
- Demonstration of uncertainty quantification and reduction techniques using a transient, stochastic thermal model for melt pool width prediction.
Conclusions:
- Understanding and quantifying uncertainty in L-PBF models is essential for reliable AM processes.
- Online measurements and estimation algorithms can effectively diminish prediction uncertainty.
- The presented concepts offer a pathway for improved estimation and control in L-PBF.
More Related Videos
06:53Additive Manufacturing of Functionally Graded Ceramic Materials by Stereolithography
Published on: January 25, 2019
10:10Three-Dimensional Particle Shape Analysis Using X-ray Computed Tomography: Experimental Procedure and Analysis Algorithms for Metal Powders
Published on: December 4, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty: Overview
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error