Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2026

06:11
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Ovine Model
Published on: October 5, 2009
12.9K
Porous Cage Macro-Topography Improves Early Fusion Rates in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Gregory M Malham1,2,3, Dean T Biddau1,4, Jordan P Laggoune1
1Neuroscience Institute, Epworth Hospital, Richmond, Melbourne, Australia.
Surgery Research and Practice
|March 25, 2024
Summary
Newer porous interbody cages (NMRT) showed faster bony fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery compared to traditional cages (NM) at 3 months. This suggests NMRT cages promote earlier integration and potentially quicker patient recovery.
Area of Science:
- Spine surgery
- Orthopedic implants
- Biomaterials
Background:
- Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) aims to alleviate pain and neurological symptoms by achieving bony fusion.
- The correlation between fusion rates and clinical outcomes after ACDF is not fully understood.
- Novel interbody cage designs with macro-topographic and porous features aim to enhance bone-implant integration and promote early fusion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical outcomes and computed tomography (CT)-evaluated fusion rates between traditional NanoMetalene™ (NM) cages and NanoMetalene™ cages with machined porous features (NMRT).
- To assess the impact of cage design on the speed and quality of bony fusion after ACDF.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, observational, nonrandomized cohort study included 89 patients undergoing ACDF.
- Patients received either NM cages (n=41) or NMRT cages (n=48).
- Clinical outcomes (VAS, NDI, SF-12) were assessed preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. CT scans at 3 and 6 months evaluated fusion using Bridwell grading.
Main Results:
- Both cage types showed significant improvement in clinical outcomes from baseline to 6 months.
- The NMRT group exhibited significantly higher CT fusion rates at 3 months (79% vs. 56%, p=0.02) compared to the NM group.
- At 6 months, fusion rates were similar (NMRT: 83% vs. NM: 78%, p=0.69), but the NMRT group showed a trend towards higher fusion quality (mean Bridwell grade 1.4 vs. 1.8, p=0.08).
Conclusions:
- NMRT cages demonstrated superior early fusion rates at 3 months post-ACDF compared to NM cages.
- The improved early fusion with NMRT suggests enhanced cage integration.
- Early CT assessment at 3 months may be sufficient for evaluating fusion in patients receiving NMRT cages, potentially allowing for earlier return to activity.

