Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
Published on: February 25, 2020
Biomarkers and computational models for predicting efficacy to tumor ICI immunotherapy
Yurong Qin1,2, Miaozhe Huo1,2, Xingwu Liu3
1Department of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, China.
Abstract:
Numerous studies have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy has great potential as a cancer treatment, leading to significant clinical improvements in numerous cases. However, it benefits a minority of patients, underscoring the importance of discovering reliable biomarkers that can be used to screen for potential beneficiaries and ultimately reduce the risk of overtreatment. Our comprehensive review focuses on the latest advancements in predictive biomarkers for ICI therapy, particularly emphasizing those that enhance the efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors immunotherapies. We explore biomarkers derived from various sources, including tumor cells, the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), body fluids, gut microbes, and metabolites. Among them, tumor cells-derived biomarkers include tumor mutational burden (TMB) biomarker, tumor neoantigen burden (TNB) biomarker, microsatellite instability (MSI) biomarker, PD-L1 expression biomarker, mutated gene biomarkers in pathways, and epigenetic biomarkers. TIME-derived biomarkers include immune landscape of TIME biomarkers, inhibitory checkpoints biomarkers, and immune repertoire biomarkers. We also discuss various techniques used to detect and assess these biomarkers, detailing their respective datasets, strengths, weaknesses, and evaluative metrics. Furthermore, we present a comprehensive review of computer models for predicting the response to ICI therapy. The computer models include knowledge-based mechanistic models and data-based machine learning (ML) models. Among the knowledge-based mechanistic models are pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models, partial differential equation (PDE) models, signal networks-based models, quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) models, and agent-based models (ABMs). ML models include linear regression models, logistic regression models, support vector machine (SVM)/random forest/extra trees/k-nearest neighbors (KNN) models, artificial neural network (ANN) and deep learning models. Additionally, there are hybrid models of systems biology and ML. We summarized the details of these models, outlining the datasets they utilize, their evaluation methods/metrics, and their respective strengths and limitations. By summarizing the major advances in the research on predictive biomarkers and computer models for the therapeutic effect and clinical utility of tumor ICI, we aim to assist researchers in choosing appropriate biomarkers or computer models for research exploration and help clinicians conduct precision medicine by selecting the best biomarkers.
Insights
Predictive biomarkers are crucial for identifying patients who will benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy. This review explores diverse biomarkers and computational models to guide precision medicine in cancer treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy shows promise in cancer treatment but benefits only a subset of patients.
- Identifying reliable predictive biomarkers is essential to optimize ICI therapy and reduce overtreatment.
- Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors are key immunotherapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive review of the latest advancements in predictive biomarkers for ICI therapy.
- To explore various sources of biomarkers, including tumor cells, the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), body fluids, gut microbes, and metabolites.
- To review computer models, including knowledge-based mechanistic and machine learning (ML) models, for predicting ICI therapy response.
Main Methods:
- Review of literature on predictive biomarkers for ICI therapy, focusing on PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors.
- Categorization of biomarkers based on their source (tumor cells, TIME, etc.) and type (e.g., TMB, MSI, PD-L1 expression, immune repertoire).
- Comprehensive analysis of various detection techniques, datasets, strengths, weaknesses, and metrics for biomarker assessment.
- Review of knowledge-based mechanistic models (e.g., PK/PD, QSP, ABM) and ML models (e.g., SVM, ANN, deep learning) for response prediction.
Main Results:
- Identified diverse biomarkers from tumor cells (TMB, TNB, MSI, PD-L1, gene mutations, epigenetics) and TIME (immune landscape, checkpoints, repertoire).
- Discussed biomarkers from other sources like body fluids, gut microbes, and metabolites.
- Detailed various computational models, including mechanistic and ML approaches, for predicting ICI response, outlining their data, evaluation, and limitations.
Conclusions:
- Accurate predictive biomarkers and computational models are vital for enhancing the efficacy and clinical utility of ICI therapy.
- This review aims to guide researchers in selecting appropriate biomarkers and models for their studies.
- The findings will aid clinicians in implementing precision medicine strategies for cancer patients receiving ICI treatment.

