Biomarkers and computational models for predicting efficacy to tumor ICI immunotherapy

Yurong Qin1,2, Miaozhe Huo1,2, Xingwu Liu3

  • 1Department of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, China.

PubMed

Insights

Predictive biomarkers are crucial for identifying patients who will benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy. This review explores diverse biomarkers and computational models to guide precision medicine in cancer treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy shows promise in cancer treatment but benefits only a subset of patients.
  • Identifying reliable predictive biomarkers is essential to optimize ICI therapy and reduce overtreatment.
  • Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors are key immunotherapies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive review of the latest advancements in predictive biomarkers for ICI therapy.
  • To explore various sources of biomarkers, including tumor cells, the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), body fluids, gut microbes, and metabolites.
  • To review computer models, including knowledge-based mechanistic and machine learning (ML) models, for predicting ICI therapy response.

Main Methods:

  • Review of literature on predictive biomarkers for ICI therapy, focusing on PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors.
  • Categorization of biomarkers based on their source (tumor cells, TIME, etc.) and type (e.g., TMB, MSI, PD-L1 expression, immune repertoire).
  • Comprehensive analysis of various detection techniques, datasets, strengths, weaknesses, and metrics for biomarker assessment.
  • Review of knowledge-based mechanistic models (e.g., PK/PD, QSP, ABM) and ML models (e.g., SVM, ANN, deep learning) for response prediction.

Main Results:

  • Identified diverse biomarkers from tumor cells (TMB, TNB, MSI, PD-L1, gene mutations, epigenetics) and TIME (immune landscape, checkpoints, repertoire).
  • Discussed biomarkers from other sources like body fluids, gut microbes, and metabolites.
  • Detailed various computational models, including mechanistic and ML approaches, for predicting ICI response, outlining their data, evaluation, and limitations.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate predictive biomarkers and computational models are vital for enhancing the efficacy and clinical utility of ICI therapy.
  • This review aims to guide researchers in selecting appropriate biomarkers and models for their studies.
  • The findings will aid clinicians in implementing precision medicine strategies for cancer patients receiving ICI treatment.

Related Concept Videos