Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA Editing02:23

RNA Editing

9.0K
RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification where a precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) nucleotide sequence is changed by base insertion, deletion, or modification. The extent of RNA editing varies from a few hundred bases, in mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomes, to a just single base, in nuclear genes of mammals. Even a single base change in the pre-mRNA can convert a codon for one amino acid into the codon for another amino acid or a stop codon. This type of re-coding can significantly affect the...
9.0K
Experimental RNAi02:15

Experimental RNAi

6.1K
RNA interference (RNAi) is a cellular mechanism that inhibits gene expression by suppressing its transcription or activating the RNA degradation process. The mechanism was discovered by Andrew Fire and Craig Mello in 1998 in plants. Today, it is observed in almost all eukaryotes, including protozoa, flies, nematodes, insects, parasites, and mammals. This precise cellular mechanism of gene silencing has been developed into a technique that provides an efficient way to identify and determine the...
6.1K
RNA Interference01:23

RNA Interference

26.0K
RNA interference (RNAi) is a process in which a small non-coding RNA molecule blocks the post-transcriptional expression of a gene by binding to its messenger RNA (mRNA) and preventing the protein from being translated.
This process occurs naturally in cells, often through the activity of genomically-encoded microRNAs. Researchers can take advantage of this mechanism by introducing synthetic RNAs to deactivate specific genes for research or therapeutic purposes. For example, RNAi could be used...
26.0K
  1. Home
  3. Research Domains
  5. Engineering
  7. Environmental Engineering
  9. Air Pollution Modelling And Control
  11. Comparative Genomic Analyses Reveal Evidence For Adaptive A-to-i Rna Editing In Insect Adar Gene

Comparative genomic analyses reveal evidence for adaptive A-to-I RNA editing in insect Adar gene

Caiqing Zheng1, Ling Ma1, Fan Song1

  • 1Department of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

Epigenetics
|March 25, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
08:50

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.6K
RNA Interference in Aquatic Beetles as a Powerful Tool for Manipulating Gene Expression at Specific Developmental Time Points
08:55

RNA Interference in Aquatic Beetles as a Powerful Tool for Manipulating Gene Expression at Specific Developmental Time Points

Published on: May 29, 2020

7.7K
Pupal and Adult Injections for RNAi and CRISPR Gene Editing in Nasonia vitripennis
08:41

Pupal and Adult Injections for RNAi and CRISPR Gene Editing in Nasonia vitripennis

Published on: December 4, 2020

5.3K

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

RNA editing offers adaptive proteomic diversity. A comparative genomic study suggests editable sites, like in the Adar gene, are evolutionarily favored over fixed DNA mutations.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • A-to-I RNA editing creates proteomic diversity, mimicking DNA mutations but with dynamic control.
  • Nonsynonymous RNA editing (recoding) provides adaptive advantages by regulating protein variants temporospatially.
  • Previous studies suggested evolutionary benefits for editable codons, but quantitative evidence was lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply a quantitative comparative genomic approach to assess the adaptiveness of individual RNA editing sites.
  • To investigate the evolutionary trajectory of the Ser>Gly auto-recoding site in the insect Adar gene across Diptera species.
  • To evaluate the selective pressure favoring editable codons over fixed genomic mutations.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative genomic analysis of 113 Diptera species.
Keywords:
A-to-I RNA editingAdarDrosophilaSer>Gly auto-recoding

Related Experiment Videos

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
08:50

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.6K
RNA Interference in Aquatic Beetles as a Powerful Tool for Manipulating Gene Expression at Specific Developmental Time Points
08:55

RNA Interference in Aquatic Beetles as a Powerful Tool for Manipulating Gene Expression at Specific Developmental Time Points

Published on: May 29, 2020

7.7K
Pupal and Adult Injections for RNAi and CRISPR Gene Editing in Nasonia vitripennis
08:41

Pupal and Adult Injections for RNAi and CRISPR Gene Editing in Nasonia vitripennis

Published on: December 4, 2020

5.3K
  • Focus on the Adar Ser>Gly auto-recoding site in Drosophila and conserved Ile>Met recoding in Syt1.
  • Statistical comparison of observed editing site occurrences against genome-wide random expectations.

    • Main Results:

    • The Adar Ser>Gly site showed a significantly lower-than-expected occurrence of the derived Gly allele in Diptera, suggesting strong negative selection against genomic replacement.
    • This indicates a selective advantage for maintaining an editable Ser codon over a permanently mutated Gly codon.
    • Similar evolutionary trends supporting conserved editable sites were observed for Ile>Met recoding in Syt1.

    Conclusions:

    • The study establishes a quantitative genomic approach to identify and justify adaptive RNA editing sites.
    • The findings highlight the evolutionary advantage of editable RNA sites over fixed genomic mutations for generating proteomic diversity.
    • Adaptive RNA editing sites identified through this method warrant priority in future functional studies.
    adaptive
    insect