Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mitochondrial Precursor Proteins01:39

Mitochondrial Precursor Proteins

2.6K
Mitochondrial precursors are partially unfolded or loosely folded polypeptide chains. Newly synthesized precursors are inhibited from spontaneously folding into their native conformation by the cytosolic chaperones, heat shock proteins 70 (Hsp70), and mitochondrial import stimulation factors (MSFs). Precursors bound to MSFs are guided to the TOM70-TOM37 receptors, while precursors bound to Hsp70  chaperones are targetted to TOM20-TOM22 receptor complexes.
Most of the mitochondrial...
2.6K
The Proteasome02:18

The Proteasome

8.6K
Eukaryotic cells can degrade proteins through several pathways. One of the most important amongst these is the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. It helps the cell eliminate the misfolded, damaged, or unwarranted cytoplasmic proteins in a highly specific manner.
In this pathway, the target proteins are first tagged with small proteins called ubiquitin. A series of enzymes carry out the ubiquitination of the target proteins - E1 (ubiquitin-activating enzyme), E2 (ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme), and E3...
8.6K
Regulated Protein Degradation02:58

Regulated Protein Degradation

7.2K
It is vital to regulate the activity of enzymatic as well as non-enzymatic proteins inside the cell. This can be achieved either through creating a balance between their rate of synthesis and degradation or regulating the intrinsic activity of the protein. Both these regulation mechanisms play an essential role in the normal functioning of cells.
Protein degradation plays two important roles in the cells. It helps to protect cells from misfolded or damaged proteins before they lead to a...
7.2K
Translocation of Proteins into the Mitochondria01:19

Translocation of Proteins into the Mitochondria

3.1K
Mitochondrial precursors are translocated to the internal subcompartments via independent mechanisms involving distinct protein machineries called translocases.
Sorting of outer membrane proteins:
Mitochondrial outer membrane proteins are of two types: the transmembrane, beta-barrel porins, and the membrane-anchored, alpha-helical proteins. Beta-barrel porin precursors are translocated by the TOM complex and inserted into the outer mitochondrial membrane by the SAM complex. In contrast,...
3.1K
The Proteasome Structure01:17

The Proteasome Structure

749
The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is a well-known mechanism utilized by eukaryotic cells to remove cytoplasmic proteins that are misfolded, damaged, or no longer needed. In this pathway, the protein that needs to be eliminated undergoes a process called ubiquitination, where a chain of ubiquitin molecules is attached to the 48th lysine residue of the target protein. This ubiquitin modification helps the proteasome distinguish between a target protein and a healthy protein.
The proteasome is an...
749
ER Retrieval Pathway01:45

ER Retrieval Pathway

3.8K
In the secretory pathway, vesicles transport proteins from one cellular compartment to another in forward transport to deliver the protein to its correct location. Occasionally, misfolded proteins and incorrect proteins escape their original compartments, and a retrieval pathway is used to return the escaped proteins to their original compartment.
The ER uses many checkpoints to prevent the entry of incorrectly folded or a resident protein as cargo onto a transport vesicle. These mechanisms...
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pulsed-Field Ablation with Two Different-Sized Pentaspline Catheters in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same author

Taming Waste Heterogeneity for Plastics Circularity with Optimized Sample Preparation Protocols for Quality Assessment.

Polymers·2026
Same author

Systematic evaluation of tools for auxin-inducible protein degradation in budding yeast.

Molecular biology of the cell·2025
Same author

Interaction of Squalamine with Lipid Membranes.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2025
Same author

Improving the Long-term Enantioselectivity of a Silicon-Carbon Bond-Forming Enzyme.

Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025
Same author

Correction to "Substrate Selection Criteria in Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysis".

ACS chemical neuroscience·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

The Determination of Protease Specificity in Mouse Tissue Extracts by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: Manipulating PH to Cause Specificity Changes
09:47

The Determination of Protease Specificity in Mouse Tissue Extracts by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: Manipulating PH to Cause Specificity Changes

Published on: May 25, 2018

6.8K

Substrate Selection Criteria in Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysis.

Celine Moser1, Nadja Guschtschin-Schmidt1,2, Mara Silber1

  • 1Institute for Biological Interfaces 4, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.

ACS Chemical Neuroscience
|March 25, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Researchers identified key structural motifs that determine how gamma-secretase (γ-secretase) recognizes its substrates, like amyloid precursor protein (APP), crucial for Alzheimer's disease research. These findings advance understanding of intramembrane protease function.

Keywords:
ITGB1Intramembrane proteolysisamyloid precursor proteinnotchnuclear magnetic resonanceγ-secretase

More Related Videos

Defining Substrate Specificities for Lipase and Phospholipase Candidates
08:59

Defining Substrate Specificities for Lipase and Phospholipase Candidates

Published on: November 23, 2016

15.0K
Identification of Kinase-substrate Pairs Using High Throughput Screening
11:13

Identification of Kinase-substrate Pairs Using High Throughput Screening

Published on: August 29, 2015

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

The Determination of Protease Specificity in Mouse Tissue Extracts by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: Manipulating PH to Cause Specificity Changes
09:47

The Determination of Protease Specificity in Mouse Tissue Extracts by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: Manipulating PH to Cause Specificity Changes

Published on: May 25, 2018

6.8K
Defining Substrate Specificities for Lipase and Phospholipase Candidates
08:59

Defining Substrate Specificities for Lipase and Phospholipase Candidates

Published on: November 23, 2016

15.0K
Identification of Kinase-substrate Pairs Using High Throughput Screening
11:13

Identification of Kinase-substrate Pairs Using High Throughput Screening

Published on: August 29, 2015

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Structural Biology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Alzheimer's disease is linked to amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide deposits, formed by γ-secretase cleavage of APP.
  • Understanding γ-secretase substrate recognition is vital, as current knowledge of how substrates enter the catalytic site is limited.
  • The enzyme cleaves diverse substrates without a consensus sequence, yet mutations in transmembrane domains (TMDs) significantly alter cleavage efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the structural and dynamic principles governing γ-secretase substrate recognition.
  • To compare the TMDs of known γ-secretase substrates with nonsubstrates to identify distinguishing features.
  • To elucidate the role of conformational flexibility and specific sequence motifs in substrate selection.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing 3D structures and dynamics of γ-secretase substrate TMDs.
  • Analysis of mutant substrates with altered cleavage efficiencies.
  • Presentation of structural and dynamic data for ITGB1, a γ-secretase nonsubstrate.
  • Comparative biophysical analysis of TMDs from substrates and nonsubstrates.

Main Results:

  • Identified three common motifs in γ-secretase substrates: a flexible TMD, a destabilized cleavage region, and a basic signature at the helix end.
  • Conformational flexibility alone enhances cleavage efficiency for substrates like APP and Notch1.
  • No single motif is exclusively required; rather, a variable combination determines substrate recognition.

Conclusions:

  • Substrate recognition by γ-secretase is determined by a combination of factors, not just conformational flexibility.
  • The identified motifs provide insights into the molecular basis of substrate specificity for this intramembrane protease.
  • These findings contribute to understanding APP processing and potential therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer's disease.