Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Guided Valve Sizing for Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement
Published on: January 20, 2022
Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty with or without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Transcatheter Aortic Valve
Omar Aldalati1,2, Matthew Jackson1, Seth Vijayan1
1Cardiothoracic Department, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Insights
Combined balloon aortic valvuloplasty and percutaneous coronary intervention (BAV-PCI) is safe and feasible for high-risk patients with aortic valve stenosis. Outcomes were comparable to BAV alone, with no significant differences in mortality.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Structural Heart Disease
Background:
- Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) remains a debated option for aortic valve stenosis (AS) in the era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
- The safety and feasibility of combining BAV with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and feasibility of combined BAV and PCI (BAV-PCI).
- To compare procedural outcomes and mortality in patients undergoing BAV with or without concurrent PCI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 264 patients undergoing BAV from November 2009 to July 2020.
- Patients were divided into three groups: combined BAV-PCI (Group A), BAV with unrevascularized CAD (Group B), and BAV without significant CAD (Group C).
- Procedural complications (VARC-3 criteria) and 30-day/one-year mortality were compared across groups.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in VARC-3 adjudicated complications were observed among the three groups (11% vs. 13% vs. 5%, p=0.168).
- Overall 30-day and one-year mortality were 9.8% and 32%, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between groups.
- Univariate analysis indicated higher mortality risk in Group B (BAV with unrevascularized CAD) compared to Group A (BAV-PCI) (HR 1.58, p=0.010).
- Multivariate analysis identified STS score, cardiogenic shock, presentation mode, and lack of definitive valve intervention as predictors of mortality.
Conclusions:
- Combined BAV-PCI is a safe and feasible strategy in high-risk patients with aortic valve stenosis.
- The procedure is associated with comparable outcomes to BAV performed with or without significant coronary artery disease.
- Key predictors of mortality include STS score, cardiogenic shock, presentation, and absence of subsequent definitive valve intervention.
Introduction:
The role of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in the era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement remains a topic of debate. We sought to study the safety and feasibility of combined BAV and percutaneous coronary intervention (BAV-PCI).
Methods:
Between November 2009 and July 2020, all patients undergoing BAV were identified and divided into three groups: combined BAV-PCI (group A), BAV with significant unrevascularised CAD (group B), and BAV without significant CAD (group C). Procedural outcomes and 30-day and one-year mortality were compared.
Results:
A total of 264 patients were studied (n = 84, 93, and 87 patients in groups A, B, and C, respectively). The STS score was 10.2 ± 8, 13.3 ± 19, and 8.1 ± 7, p = 0.026, in groups A, B, and C, respectively. VARC-3 adjudicated complications were similar among groups (11%, 13%, and 5%, respectively, p = 0.168, respectively). Thirty-day and one-year mortality were 9.8% (n = 26) and 32% (n = 86) of the entire cohort. The differences among groups did not reach statistical significance. Using univariate Cox regression analysis, group B patients were at higher risk of dying compared to group A patients (HR 1.58, 95% CI: 1.11-2.25, p = 0.010). With multivariate Cox regression analysis, the predictors of mortality were STS score, cardiogenic shock, mode of presentation, and lack of subsequent definitive valve intervention.
Conclusion:
In high-risk patients with aortic valve stenosis, combined BAV-PCI is safe and feasible with comparable outcomes to BAV with and without significant CAD.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

