Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Large Scale Non-targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Serum by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry UPLC-MS
Published on: March 14, 2013
Tandem Mass Spectrometry across Platforms
Corey Hoang1, Winnie Uritboonthai1, Linh Hoang1
1Scripps Center for Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
Abstract:
PubChem serves as a comprehensive repository, housing over 100 million unique chemical structures representing the breadth of our chemical knowledge across numerous fields including metabolism, pharmaceuticals, toxicology, cosmetics, agriculture, and many more. Rapid identification of these small molecules increasingly relies on electrospray ionization (ESI) paired with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), particularly by comparison to genuine standard MS/MS data sets. Despite its widespread application, achieving consistency in MS/MS data across various analytical platforms remains an unaddressed concern. This study evaluated MS/MS data derived from one hundred molecular standards utilizing instruments from five manufacturers, inclusive of quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) and quadrupole orbitrap "exactive" (QE) mass spectrometers by Agilent (QTOF), Bruker (QTOF), SCIEX (QTOF), Waters (QTOF), and Thermo QE. We assessed fragment ion variations at multiple collisional energies (0, 10, 20, and 40 eV) using the cosine scoring algorithm for comparisons and the number of fragments observed. A parallel visual analysis of the MS/MS spectra across instruments was conducted, consistent with a standard procedure that is used to circumvent the still prevalent issue of mischaracterizations as shown for dimethyl sphingosine and C20 sphingosine. Our analysis revealed a notable consistency in MS/MS data and identifications, with fragment ions' m/z values exhibiting the highest concordance between instrument platforms at 20 eV, the other collisional energies (0, 10, and 40 eV) were significantly lower. While moving toward a standardized ESI MS/MS protocol is required for dependable molecular characterization, our results also underscore the continued importance of corroborating MS/MS data against standards to ensure accurate identifications. Our findings suggest that ESI MS/MS manufacturers, akin to the established norms for gas chromatography mass spectrometry instruments, should standardize the collision energy at 20 eV across different instrument platforms.
More Related Videos
10:37Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
Published on: November 15, 2017
12:11Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization
Published on: February 27, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Secondary fragmentations occur in the interaction cell and can be induced by various factors. Fragmentation induced by collision with inert gases, such as N2, Ar, He, etc., is called collision-induced...
Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry
This technique helps gather information regarding the protein from which the peptide was obtained and to study the peptides’ amino acid sequence. Identifying peptides from a complex mixture is an important component of the growing field of...
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...
Mass Spectrometers
Mass Spectrometry: Overview
High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS)