Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

77
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
77
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

136
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
136
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

162
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
162
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Framing anatomical variation in anatomy textbooks: Language use and its implications.

Anatomical sciences education·2026
Same author

Incorporating Evolutionary Theory Into Forensic Anthropology Methods and Practice: A Proof-of-Concept Study Using Skeletal Sex Estimation.

American journal of biological anthropology·2025
Same author

Investigating identification disparities in forensic anthropology casework.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Community-engaged ancient DNA project reveals diverse origins of 18th-century African descendants in Charleston, South Carolina.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Forensic anthropology casework performance: Assessing accuracy and trends for biological profile estimates on a comprehensive sample of identified decedent cases.

Journal of forensic sciences·2021
Same author

Allometric scaling and growth: Evaluation and applications in subadult body mass estimation.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.1K

Considerations for age estimation accuracy: Method-derived outcomes and practitioner interpretations.

Cris Hughes1, An-Di Yim2, Chelsey Juarez3

  • 1Department of Anthropology and Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.

Journal of Forensic Sciences
|March 26, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Forensic anthropologists achieve high accuracy in age-at-death estimations by synthesizing multiple methods. Practitioner interpretation is key to improving accuracy beyond individual method performance.

Keywords:
accuracyage estimationcaseworkforensic anthropologyinterpretationsmethods

More Related Videos

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.5K
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

15.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.1K
Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.5K
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

15.7K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Anthropology
  • Bioarchaeology
  • Human Osteology

Background:

  • Recent studies report 92% accuracy in age-at-death estimations by U.S. forensic anthropologists.
  • This study investigates method-level accuracy versus case report-level accuracy in forensic anthropology casework.
  • The Forensic Anthropology Database for Assessing Methods Accuracy (FADAMA) was utilized.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of individual age estimation methods with overall case report accuracy.
  • To identify the most frequently used age estimation methods in U.S. forensic casework.
  • To evaluate the impact of practitioner interpretation and method combination on accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of method application rates in 641 cases from FADAMA.
  • Focus on 15 methods with application rates exceeding 45 cases.
  • Statistical analysis, including Fisher's Exact test, to assess accuracy correlations.

Main Results:

  • Only four of the 15 analyzed methods met or exceeded the 92% case report accuracy.
  • Eleven methods showed accuracies ranging from 54% to 91%, with six below 70%.
  • Practitioner interpretation of method combinations improved accuracy and age range width.

Conclusions:

  • A significant discrepancy exists between individual method accuracy and reported case-level accuracy.
  • Practitioner synthesis of multiple method outcomes is crucial for accurate age-at-death estimations.
  • The number of methods used did not significantly impact case report-level accuracy.