Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MANNERS: A strategy for representation learning in multivariate datasets with high proportions of missing data.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

CEI: A Clonal Expansion Identifier for T-cell receptor clones following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Journal of immunological methods·2026
Same author

Beyond the LUMIR challenge: The pathway to foundational registration models.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same author

MRIgRT real-time target tracking: TrackRAD2025 challenge report.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same author

Current perspective in acute ischemic stroke: net water uptake and imaging-guided selection as bridges to personalized, tissue-based care.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same author

A new, machine learning-based approach to metastatic neuroendocrine tumors of unknown origin.

Journal of neuroendocrinology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Three-Dimensional Phase Resolved Functional Lung Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10:44

Three-Dimensional Phase Resolved Functional Lung Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: June 21, 2024

487

Benchmarking machine learning-based real-time respiratory signal predictors in 4D SBRT.

Lukas Wimmert1,2,3, Maximilian Nielsen1,2,3, Frederic Madesta1,2,3

  • 1Institute for Applied Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Medical Physics
|March 27, 2024
PubMed
Summary

The Lstm model best predicts respiratory motion for lung cancer radiotherapy, showing minimal error even with longer prediction times. It also performs better on unusual breathing patterns compared to simpler models.

Keywords:
predictive filtersradiotherapyrespiratory motion

More Related Videos

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
08:54

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Published on: May 8, 2018

14.2K
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

15.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Three-Dimensional Phase Resolved Functional Lung Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10:44

Three-Dimensional Phase Resolved Functional Lung Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: June 21, 2024

487
Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
08:54

Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Published on: May 8, 2018

14.2K
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

15.7K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiotherapy
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Respiratory motion significantly impacts thoracic and abdominal tumor radiotherapy.
  • External breathing signals are used as surrogates for tumor motion, but system latencies cause temporal lags.
  • Respiratory signal prediction models are crucial for improving imaging and dose delivery by compensating for time delays.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare six state-of-the-art machine and deep learning models for respiratory signal prediction.
  • To evaluate real-time and real-world applicability of these models.
  • To ensure reproducibility by providing open-source models and data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized 2502 clinical breathing signals for training, validation, and testing.
  • Compared Linear, Dlinear, Xgboost, Lstm, Trans-Enc, and Trans-TSF models.
  • Assessed prediction performance across 480, 680, and 920 ms horizons and analyzed robustness on out-of-distribution (OOD) signals.

Main Results:

  • Lstm model demonstrated the lowest prediction errors across all horizons.
  • Prediction accuracy decreased for out-of-distribution (OOD) signals, with Lstm and Trans-Enc showing less performance loss.
  • Most models, except Trans-Enc, exhibited inference times suitable for real-time application.

Conclusions:

  • The Lstm model offers the most accurate respiratory signal prediction.
  • Simpler prediction models struggle with OOD signals due to limited signal history access.