Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging
Published on: April 8, 2016
Benchmarking digital displays (monitors) for histological diagnoses: the nephropathology use case
Giorgio Cazzaniga1, Francesco Mascadri1, Stefano Marletta2
1Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Aim:
The digital transformation of the pathology laboratory is being continuously sustained by the introduction of innovative technologies promoting whole slide image (WSI)-based primary diagnosis. Here, we proposed a real-life benchmark of a pathology-dedicated medical monitor for the primary diagnosis of renal biopsies, evaluating the concordance between the 'traditional' microscope and commercial monitors using WSI from different scanners.
Methods:
The College of American Pathologists WSI validation guidelines were used on 60 consecutive renal biopsies from three scanners (Aperio, 3DHISTECH and Hamamatsu) using pathology-dedicated medical grade (MG), professional grade (PG) and consumer-off-the-shelf (COTS) monitors, comparing results with the microscope diagnosis after a 2-week washout period.
Results:
MG monitor was faster (1090 vs 1159 vs 1181 min, delta of 6-8%, p<0.01), with slightly better performances on the detection of concurrent diseases compared with COTS (κ=1 vs 0.96, 95% CI=0.87 to 1), but equal concordance to the commercial monitors on main diagnosis (κ=1). Minor discrepancies were noted on specific scores/classifications, with MG and PG monitors closer to the reference report (r=0.98, 95% CI=0.83 to 1 vs 0.98, 95% CI=0.83 to 1 vs 0.91, 95% CI=0.76 to 1, κ=0.93, 95% CI=077 to 1 vs 0.93, 95% CI=0.77 to 1 vs 0.86, 95% CI=0.64 to 1, κ=1 vs 0.50, 95% CI=0 to 1 vs 0.50, 95% CI=0 to 1, for IgA, antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody and lupus nephritis, respectively). Streamlined Pipeline for Amyloid detection through congo red fluorescence Digital Analysis detected amyloidosis on both monitors (4 of 30, 13% cases), allowing detection of minimal interstitial deposits with slight overestimation of the Amyloid Score (average 6 vs 7).
Conclusions:
The digital transformation needs careful assessment of the hardware component to support a smart and safe diagnostic process. Choosing the display for WSI is critical in the process and requires adequate planning.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Automated Microbial Diagnostics

