Functional analysis of cell lines derived from SMAD3-related Loeys-Dietz syndrome patients provides insights into

Nathalie P de Wagenaar1,2, Lisa M van den Bersselaar3, Hanny J H M Odijk1

  • 1Department of Molecular Genetics, Oncode Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Pathogenic SMAD3 variants cause Loeys-Dietz syndrome type 3. Functional tests reveal differences in patient cells, distinguishing between dominant-negative and haploinsufficient variants for better interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Cardiovascular Research
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • Pathogenic (P)/likely pathogenic (LP) SMAD3 variants are associated with Loeys-Dietz syndrome type 3 (LDS3).
  • LDS3 is characterized by vascular abnormalities including aneurysms, dissections, and tortuosity, alongside osteoarthritis.
  • Understanding the functional impact of different SMAD3 variant types is crucial for accurate clinical interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the functional impact of P/LP SMAD3 variants using patient-derived cells.
  • To differentiate between dominant-negative (DN) and haploinsufficient (HI) SMAD3 variants through functional assays.
  • To enhance the interpretation of SMAD3 variants in the context of LDS3.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of clinical data from individuals with P/LP SMAD3 variants.
  • Functional analyses using patient-derived vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and fibroblasts.
  • In vitro differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts for cellular assessment.

Main Results:

  • Dominant-negative (DN) SMAD3 variants in the MH2 domain were associated with more major vascular events at a younger age compared to haploinsufficient (HI) variants.
  • DN SMAD3 variant fibroblasts showed reduced differentiation potential, while HI variants exhibited increased potential.
  • HI SMAD3 variant VSMCs displayed elevated SMA expression and altered MYH11 isoform expression; DN SMAD3 variant myofibroblasts showed reduced extracellular matrix formation.

Conclusions:

  • Functional assessment of differentiation potential, SMA, and MYH11 expression can distinguish between P/LP HI and DN SMAD3 variants.
  • Observed cellular differences in fibroblasts and VSMCs correlate with distinct disease manifestations in LDS3 patients.
  • Myofibroblast differentiation serves as a viable in vitro model for studying SMAD3 variant effects, offering an alternative to VSMCs.