Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

07:20
Inducement and Evaluation of a Murine Model of Experimental Myopia
Published on: January 22, 2019
9.9K
Prospects for Using Computer Accommodography to Predict Myopia Development in Young Adults.
Roman Zelentsov1, Liliya Poskotinova2, Alexandra Moiseeva1
1Department of Family Medicine and Internal Diseases, Northern State Medical University, 163069 Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Life (Basel, Switzerland)
|March 28, 2024
Summary
Computer accommodation assessment can identify young adults at risk for myopia. This study defined normal accommodation ranges and found computer visual syndrome in nearly half of non-myopic students.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Optometry
- Visual Science
Background:
- Accommodative and refractive errors affect 23% of the global population, with their diagnostic value requiring further study.
- Computer accommodation methods offer objective parameters for assessing visual function.
- Myopia is a prevalent refractive error, necessitating early detection and risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate objective parameters of accommodative insufficiency in young adults.
- To compare accommodative parameters between myopic and non-myopic university students.
- To establish normal ranges for key accommodation metrics in a non-myopic population.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 116 university students aged 21-23.
- Objective measurement of accommodative parameters including accommodative response coefficient (ARC), deviation of ARC (σARC), accommodogram growth coefficient (AGC), coefficient of microfluctuations (CMF), and deviation of CMF (σCMF).
- Definition of normal ranges using 10th and 90th percentile values for non-myopic participants.
Main Results:
- Normal ranges for accommodation parameters were established: ARC (-0.17 to -0.38 c.u.), σARC (0.08 to 0.41 c.u.), AGC (0.0 to 0.43 c.u.), CMF (54.26 to 58.55 mcf/min), and σCMF (2.58 to 5.26 c.u.).
- Computer visual syndrome was prevalent (40.9%) in non-myopic participants, alongside eye strain (11.9%), accommodation cramp (4.5%), and minimal accommodative response (3.6%).
- Computer accommodation assessment identified young individuals without myopia but at increased risk.
Conclusions:
- Computer accommodation assessment is a valuable tool for detecting subclinical accommodative dysfunction.
- Objective parameters can identify young adults at higher risk of developing myopia.
- Establishing normative data is crucial for interpreting accommodative function in clinical settings.

