Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Deformation of Member under Multiple Loadings01:11

Deformation of Member under Multiple Loadings

628
When a rod is made of different materials or has various cross-sections, it must be divided into parts that meet the necessary conditions for determining the deformation. These parts are each characterized by their internal force, cross-sectional area, length, and modulus of elasticity. These parameters are then used to compute the deformation of the entire rod.
In the case of a member with a variable cross-section, the strain is not constant but depends on the position. The deformation of an...
628
Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry01:16

Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry

723
Eccentric axial loading occurs when an axial load is applied away from the centroidal axis of a structural member. This scenario is common in engineering, where structural elements may not be directly aligned due to various design or functional requirements.
723

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First-in-Human Study of a Novel Coronary Crossing Device for Calcified Lesions.

JACC. Cardiovascular interventions·2025
Same author

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Escalating to Weekly Adalimumab Dosing for the Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis: A Multicenter Study.

Ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Pars plana vitrectomy with tissue plasminogen activator for traumatic submacular hemorrhage.

International journal of ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Sensor Fusion for Enhancing Motion Capture: Integrating Optical and Inertial Motion Capture Systems.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Analysis of seat belt buckle release forces in post-rollover scenarios: Implications for passenger safety.

Applied ergonomics·2025
Same author

A fatigue failure framework for the assessment of highly variable low back loading using inertial motion capture - a case study.

Ergonomics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

16.8K

Estimating Compressive and Shear Forces at L5-S1: Exploring the Effects of Load Weight, Asymmetry, and Height Using

Iván Nail-Ulloa1,2, Michael Zabala3, Richard Sesek1

  • 1Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|March 28, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Inertial motion capture (IMC) underestimates L5-S1 joint forces during lifting tasks compared to optical motion capture (OMC). Enhancements in sensor placement and anthropometric modeling are needed for accurate ergonomic assessments.

Keywords:
Xsensergonomicslifting biomechanicsmotion capturemusculoskeletal modelingwearables

More Related Videos

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.2K
3D Kinematic Analysis for the Functional Evaluation in the Rat Model of Sciatic Nerve Crush Injury
08:20

3D Kinematic Analysis for the Functional Evaluation in the Rat Model of Sciatic Nerve Crush Injury

Published on: February 12, 2020

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

16.8K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.2K
3D Kinematic Analysis for the Functional Evaluation in the Rat Model of Sciatic Nerve Crush Injury
08:20

3D Kinematic Analysis for the Functional Evaluation in the Rat Model of Sciatic Nerve Crush Injury

Published on: February 12, 2020

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Ergonomics
  • Motion Capture Technology

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of spinal loads during manual handling is crucial for preventing musculoskeletal injuries.
  • Inertial motion capture (IMC) offers a portable alternative to optical motion capture (OMC) for biomechanical analysis.
  • Evaluating the validity of IMC for assessing joint forces in occupational settings is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare compressive and shear force estimates at the L5-S1 joint using IMC versus OMC during manual lifting.
  • To identify discrepancies in kinematic measurements between IMC and OMC systems.
  • To determine factors influencing force estimation accuracy in IMC-based musculoskeletal models.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty-six participants performed manual lifting and lowering tasks with varying loads and heights.
  • Simultaneous data collection using a full-body IMC system and an optical motion capture (OMC) system.
  • Analysis of L5-S1 joint compressive and shear forces, joint angles, and segment distances.

Main Results:

  • IMC consistently underestimated L5-S1 compressive forces (34%) and shear forces (30%) compared to OMC.
  • Significant underestimation of trunk flexion angles (up to 28 degrees) and segment lengths by the IMC system.
  • Load weight was the most significant factor affecting force estimates, especially at lower lifting heights.

Conclusions:

  • IMC systems show potential for ergonomic assessments but require improvements in sensor placement and anthropometric modeling for reliable force and kinematic estimations.
  • Discrepancies in joint angles and segment distances highlight limitations in current IMC models.
  • Further research is needed to optimize IMC for accurate occupational biomechanics analysis.