Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Goodness-of-Fit Test

Goodness-of-Fit Test

The goodness-of-fit test is a type of hypothesis test which determines whether the data "fits" a particular distribution. For example, one may suspect that some anonymous data may fit a binomial distribution. A chi-square test (meaning the distribution for the hypothesis test is chi-square) can be used to determine if there is a fit. The null and alternative hypotheses may be written in sentences or stated as equations or inequalities. The test statistic for a goodness-of-fit test is given as...

Classification of Systems-II

Classification of Systems-II

Continuous-time systems have continuous input and output signals, with time measured continuously. These systems are generally defined by differential or algebraic equations. For instance, in an RC circuit, the relationship between input and output voltage is expressed through a differential equation derived from Ohm's law and the capacitor relation,

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier. To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...

Aggregates Classification

Aggregates Classification

Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...

Classification of Systems-I

Classification of Systems-I

Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Saturation Genome Editing reveals the functional impact of RAD51D <i>and</i> XRCC2 variants.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Improving splice site usage prediction with SPLAIRE.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

On the state of protein function prediction: a report on the fourth CAFA challenge.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Gene- and domain-aware calibration increases the clinical utility of variant effect predictors.

Research square·2026

Same author

How Not to be Seen: Predicting Unseen Enzyme Functions using Contrastive Learning.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

A PLUM Job: Peptide modeLs for Understanding and engineering antiMicrobial therapeutics.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same journal

Region-aware bridge modeling enables interpretable mesoscale representation of spatial transcriptomic tissue sections.

Bioinformatics advances·2026

Same journal

Microbiome differential abundance methodologies to detect relevant taxa associated with chemotherapy toxicity rate in colorectal cancer.

Bioinformatics advances·2026

Same journal

maldipickr dereplicates microbial MALDI-TOF spectra to facilitate multiplexed isolation.

Bioinformatics advances·2026

Same journal

RAM-MSA: an anytime memory-bounded method for exact multiple sequence alignment using path finding.

Bioinformatics advances·2026

Same journal

Interpretable machine learning for low-sample multi-omics: a case study of ferret vaccine response.

Bioinformatics advances·2026

Same journal

DeepTaxa: a hybrid CNN-BERT framework for 16S rRNA taxonomic classification.

Bioinformatics advances·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Published on: January 13, 2023

CAFA-evaluator: a Python tool for benchmarking ontological classification methods.

Damiano Piovesan¹, Davide Zago², Parnal Joshi^2,3

¹Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.

Bioinformatics Advances

|March 28, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

CAFA-evaluator is a Python program that efficiently evaluates protein function prediction methods on hierarchical data. It is the official software for the Critical Assessment of protein Function Annotation (CAFA) benchmarking.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Automatic Image Processing to Determine the Community Size Structure of Riverine Macroinvertebrates

Published on: January 13, 2023

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Area of Science:

Bioinformatics
Computational Biology
Functional Genomics

Background:

Evaluating protein function prediction is crucial for understanding biological systems.
Existing methods often struggle with hierarchical concept dependencies in modern ontologies.
The Critical Assessment of protein Function Annotation (CAFA) requires robust evaluation tools.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce CAFA-evaluator, a Python program for evaluating prediction methods on hierarchical targets.
To generalize multi-label evaluation to directed acyclic graph (DAG) structured ontologies.
To provide an efficient and maintainable tool for benchmarking protein function annotation.

Main Methods:

Leverages matrix computation and topological sorting for high efficiency.
Generalizes multi-label evaluation to modern ontologies with DAGs.
Replicates the benchmarking methodology of the Critical Assessment of protein Function Annotation (CAFA).

Main Results:

CAFA-evaluator demonstrates high efficiency in evaluating prediction performance.
The program is reliable and accurate for assessing protein function annotation.
It successfully replicates the CAFA benchmarking process.

Conclusions:

CAFA-evaluator is a powerful and efficient tool for evaluating protein function prediction methods.
Its design makes it easy to maintain and adaptable to various ontologies.
Selected as the official CAFA evaluation software due to its reliability and accuracy.