Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Subcutaneous Trigeminal Nerve Field Stimulation for Refractory Facial Pain
Published on: May 10, 2017
Avoidance of axonal stimulation with sinusoidal epiretinal stimulation.
Andrea Corna1, Andreea-Elena Cojocaru1, Mai Thu Bui1
1Institute of Biomedical Electronics, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Electrical stimulation for artificial vision requires high spatial resolution. This study shows that specific frequencies can selectively activate retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) while avoiding unwanted axon activation, improving visual prosthesis design.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Ophthalmology
Background:
- High spatial resolution in neuromodulation, especially electrical stimulation, is crucial for achieving high-acuity artificial vision.
- Epiretinal implants face challenges with undesired distal axon activation, limiting the effectiveness of visual prostheses.
- Understanding the precise activation patterns of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) is key to overcoming these limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the focal and axonal activation of RGCs using epiretinal sinusoidal stimulation at various frequencies.
- To determine stimulation parameters that allow for selective RGC activation while avoiding distal axon stimulation.
- To inform the development of improved strategies for artificial vision.
Main Methods:
- Experiments were conducted on ex-vivo retinae from photoreceptor degenerated (rd10) mice.
- A high-density CMOS-based microelectrode array was used for high-resolution localization of RGCs and their axons.
- Sinusoidal stimulation frequencies ranged from 40 to 100 Hz, with analysis of current and charge density thresholds.
Main Results:
- Current and charge density thresholds for focal and distal axon activation were determined for frequencies of 40, 60, 80, and 100 Hz.
- Distal axon activation was successfully avoided up to specific stimulation amplitudes at 40 Hz (0.23 µA) and 60 Hz (0.28 µA).
- The ratio of focal to axonal activation thresholds increased with decreasing frequency, with minimal axonal response at 40 Hz.
Conclusions:
- Results provide a basis for defining spatially selective stimulation strategies to avoid axonal activation in retinal implants.
- This research addresses a significant limitation in current artificial vision technology.
- The findings have potential applications in other neuroprosthetic fields requiring focal electrical stimulation.
More Related Videos
03:49Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
Published on: October 11, 2024
07:00Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024