Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Whole Genome Sequencing of Candida glabrata for Detection of Markers of Antifungal Drug Resistance
Published on: December 28, 2017
Clinical evaluation of antifungal de-escalation in Candida infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Marta Albanell-Fernández1, Fernando Salazar González2, Olalla Montero Pérez3
1Pharmacy Service, Division of Medicines, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Objectives:
De-escalation (DES) from echinocandins to azoles is recommended by several medical societies in Candida infections. We summarise the evidence of DES on clinical and microbiological cure and 30-day survival and compare it with continuing the treatment with echinocandins (non-DES).
Methods:
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus. Studies describing DES in inpatients and reporting any of the outcomes evaluated were included. Pooled estimates of the tree outcomes were calculated with a fixed or random-effects model. Heterogeneity was explored stratifying by subgroups and via meta-regression. This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023475486).
Results:
Of 1853 records identified, 9 studies were included, totalling 1575 patients. Five studies stepped-down to fluconazole; one to voriconazole and three to any of azoles. The mean day of DES was 5.2 (4.6-6.5) days. The clinical cure OR was 1.29 (95% CI: 0.88-1.88); the microbiological cure 1.62 (95% CI: 0.71-3.71); and 30-day survival 2.17 (95% CI: 1.09-4.32). The 30-day survival data into subgroups showed higher effect on critically ill patients and serious-risk bias studies. Meta-regression did not identify significant effect modifiers.
Conclusions:
DES is a safe strategy; it showed no higher 30-day mortality and a trend towards greater clinical and microbiological cure.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Antifungal Agents

