Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Studying Triple Negative Breast Cancer Using Orthotopic Breast Cancer Model
Published on: March 20, 2020
Triple-Negative Myelofibrosis: Disease Features, Response to Treatment and Outcomes
Luis E Aguirre1, Akriti Jain2, Somedeb Ball3
1Department of Medical Oncology, Adult Leukemia Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Background:
Myelofibrosis is the most aggressive subtype among classical BCR::ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. About 90% of cases are driven by constitutive activation of 1 of 3 genes impacting the JAK/STAT pathway: JAK2, CALR, and MPL. Triple-negative myelofibrosis (TN-MF) accounts for only 5%-10% of cases and carries the worst outcomes. Little has been described about this subset of disease. Given the marked heterogeneity surrounding disease biology, clonal architecture, clinical presentation, and poor outcomes in TN-MF, identification of features of interest and assessment of treatment response are areas in need of further investigation.
Patients And Methods:
We collected and evaluated baseline clinical and molecular parameters from 626 patients with a diagnosis of myelofibrosis who presented to the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa (Florida, US) between 2003 and 2021 and compared them based on presence or absence of the three classical phenotypic driver mutations.
Results:
A small proportion of patients (6%) harbored TN-MF which correlated with inferior outcomes, marked by a 4-year reduction in overall survival time compared to the non-TN cohort (mOS 37.4 months vs. 85.7 months; P = .009) and higher rates of leukemic transformation. More pronounced thrombocytopenia and anemia, lower LDH, EPO levels, as well as lower percentage of marrow blasts at baseline were more commonly seen in TN-MF (P < .05). Similarly, patients with TN-MF had higher risk disease per DIPSS+ and GIPSS. Mutations impacting RNA splicing, epigenetic modification and signaling, specifically SRSF2, SETBP1, IDH2, CBL, and GNAS, were more commonly seen among those lacking a classical phenotypic driver. The prevalence of co-mutant ASXL1/SRSF2 clones was significantly higher in TN-MF as was trisomy 8. TN patients had fewer responses (46.2% vs. 63.4%) and shorter duration of response to ruxolitinib.
Conclusion:
TN-MF is invariably associated with significantly decreased survival and more aggressive clinical behavior with higher rates of leukemic transformation and shorter duration of response to ruxolitinib. Mutations impacting RNA splicing, epigenetic modification and signaling (SRSF2, SETBP1, IDH2, CBL, and GNAS) are more common in TN-MF, which likely drive its aggressive course and may account for suboptimal responses to JAK inhibition.
Insights
Triple-negative myelofibrosis (TN-MF) is an aggressive subtype of myelofibrosis associated with poor survival and higher rates of leukemia transformation. TN-MF patients show distinct molecular mutations and have shorter responses to ruxolitinib.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm.
- Triple-negative myelofibrosis (TN-MF) lacks common mutations (JAK2, CALR, MPL) and has poor outcomes.
- Understanding TN-MF biology and treatment response is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate clinical and molecular features of TN-MF.
- To compare outcomes and treatment responses in TN-MF versus classical MF.
- To identify potential drivers of TN-MF aggressiveness.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 626 MF patients.
- Evaluation of baseline clinical and molecular data.
- Comparison based on the presence or absence of classical driver mutations.
Main Results:
- TN-MF (6% of cases) showed inferior survival (37.4 vs. 85.7 months) and higher leukemic transformation rates.
- TN-MF patients had more severe thrombocytopenia/anemia and higher risk scores (DIPSS+, GIPSS).
- Mutations in SRSF2, SETBP1, IDH2, CBL, GNAS, ASXL1/SRSF2 co-mutations, and trisomy 8 were more frequent in TN-MF. TN-MF patients had lower response rates (46.2% vs. 63.4%) and shorter response duration to ruxolitinib.
Conclusions:
- TN-MF is linked to significantly decreased survival and aggressive clinical behavior.
- Higher rates of leukemic transformation and shorter ruxolitinib response duration are observed in TN-MF.
- Frequent mutations in RNA splicing, epigenetic, and signaling pathways may drive TN-MF aggressiveness and suboptimal JAK inhibitor response.
More Related Videos
07:39Intracellular Phosphoflow Cytometry of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenotransplants
Published on: June 6, 2025
09:57Comprehensive Protocol to Sample and Process Bone Marrow for Measuring Measurable Residual Disease and Leukemic Stem Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Published on: March 5, 2018