Impact of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Left Atrial Ejection Fraction in Advanced Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Chris M Anthony1,2, Tom Kai Ming Wang3,4, Donna Salam3

  • 1Department of Cardiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

JACC. Advances
|March 29, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Reduced left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF) independently predicts mortality in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Higher LAEF is linked to better outcomes, even when considering infarct size and mitral regurgitation.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Heart Failure Research

Background:

  • Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF) in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is not well-established.
  • LAEF may offer unique insights into cardiac function beyond traditional measures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the prognostic impact of LAEF in advanced ICM patients.
  • To assess LAEF's predictive power for mortality and cardiac transplant, adjusted for key cardiac remodeling and dysfunction parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 718 ICM patients undergoing CMR between 2001-2019.
  • LAEF, left atrial volume index, myocardial infarct size (MIS), left ventricular remodeling, and functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) quantified by CMR.
  • Multivariable Cox regression used to determine the primary endpoint (all-cause mortality or cardiac transplant).

Main Results:

  • Higher LAEF independently associated with reduced risk of mortality/transplant (HR 0.24, P < 0.001), even after adjusting for FMR and MIS.
  • Patients with LAEF <20% and MIS >30% had the highest adjusted risk (HR 3.20).
  • Patients with LAEF >50% and MIS <15% had the lowest risk (HR 1.07).

Conclusions:

  • Reduced LAEF is an independent predictor of increased mortality in ICM patients.
  • The risk associated with declining LAEF is continuous and incremental to other adverse outcome predictors.
  • LAEF provides significant prognostic information in ICM, independent of infarct size and FMR severity.
Abstract