Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

16.2K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.2K
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

22.0K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.0K
Mate Choice01:20

Mate Choice

8.0K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
8.0K
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

40.4K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
40.4K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

31.3K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
31.3K
What is Natural Selection?01:32

What is Natural Selection?

115.1K
Natural selection is an evolutionary process in which individuals with survival-promoting traits reproduce at higher rates. These favorable traits become more common within a population or species. Naturally selected traits initially arise via random genetic mutations. In order for selection to occur, there must be variation within a population, the trait controlling the variation must be heritable, and there must be an evolutionary advantage for variation in the trait.
115.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The protective value of the size and movement components of deimatic behavior.

Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology·2026
Same author

Biologically inspired warning patterns deter a passerine, <i>Parus major</i>, from digital turbine blades.

Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology·2026
Same author

Trehalase-trehalose axis in the human brain: A potential modulator of neuroprotection and neurodegeneration.

Neurobiology of aging·2026
Same author

Telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of the wood tiger moth Arctia plantaginis.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Are Toxic Butterflies More Easily Detected by Human 'Predators'?

Ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

High detectability costs select weak warning signals in chemically defended gregarious prey.

Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments
09:03

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments

Published on: May 21, 2019

9.6K

Predator selection on multicomponent warning signals in an aposematic moth.

Liisa Hämäläinen1,2,3, Georgina E Binns1, Nathan S Hart1

  • 1School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, 14 Eastern Road, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.

Behavioral Ecology : Official Journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
|March 29, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Predators focusing on specific warning signals, like abdominal stripes on moths, can allow other traits, such as wing patterns, to vary. This explains how aposematic prey can evolve diverse coloration.

Keywords:
Lepidopteraaposematismcolor patternnoisy minersaliencewarning signals

More Related Videos

Using Insect Electroantennogram Sensors on Autonomous Robots for Olfactory Searches
07:23

Using Insect Electroantennogram Sensors on Autonomous Robots for Olfactory Searches

Published on: August 4, 2014

23.0K
Electrophysiological Measurements from a Moth Olfactory System
06:16

Electrophysiological Measurements from a Moth Olfactory System

Published on: March 29, 2011

13.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments
09:03

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments

Published on: May 21, 2019

9.6K
Using Insect Electroantennogram Sensors on Autonomous Robots for Olfactory Searches
07:23

Using Insect Electroantennogram Sensors on Autonomous Robots for Olfactory Searches

Published on: August 4, 2014

23.0K
Electrophysiological Measurements from a Moth Olfactory System
06:16

Electrophysiological Measurements from a Moth Olfactory System

Published on: March 29, 2011

13.9K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Animal Behavior
  • Ecology

Background:

  • Aposematic prey use warning signals to deter predators, but intraspecific variation in these signals is common despite expected selection for uniformity.
  • Predator learning and avoidance of specific signal components may relax selection on other warning signal traits, potentially explaining this variation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how different components of warning coloration influence predator attack decisions in the aposematic moth *Amata nigriceps*.
  • To test the hypothesis that predator attention to specific signal elements can explain the observed variability in aposematic patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Artificial moth models with manipulated wing spot size and abdominal stripe presence/number were created.
  • A natural avian predator, the noisy miner (*Manorina melanocephala*), was presented with these models.
  • Predator attack decisions were recorded to assess the influence of different warning signal components.

Main Results:

  • When abdominal stripes were present, birds showed no preference for wing signal variations.
  • In the absence of abdominal stripes, birds preferred models with smaller wing spots.
  • Birds were more likely to attack models with fewer abdominal stripes.

Conclusions:

  • Avian predators primarily focus on the abdominal stripes of *Amata nigriceps*, suggesting this component drives avoidance learning.
  • This predator attention to abdominal stripes may relax selection pressure on wing coloration, allowing for greater intraspecific variation.
  • Understanding the role of individual signal components is crucial for explaining the evolution of warning coloration in aposematic species.