Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intravestibular Lipoma with Intracochlear Extension: A Case Report on Surgical Management and Cochlear Implantation.

The journal of international advanced otology·2026
Same author

Editorial: Cholesteatoma surgery: treatment outcome and follow up.

Frontiers in surgery·2026
Same author

Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement by using optical navigation.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same author

Eight years of vestibular screening in children at increased risk: Results and perspectives.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2026
Same author

Identification and synthesis of decision-making factors in vestibular schwannoma treatment.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same author

3D-motion mapping of the malleus-incus complex using a robot-mounted optical coherence tomography vibrometry system.

Journal of biomedical optics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.2K

Objective preclinical measures for bone conduction implants.

Irina Wils1, Alexander Geerardyn1,2, Tristan Putzeys1,3

  • 1Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|March 29, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predicting intracochlear pressure during bone conduction stimulation is possible using ear canal pressure and promontory velocity. Accounting for stimulation position significantly improves prediction accuracy for these less invasive methods.

Keywords:
bone conductionear canal pressureintracochlear pressureobjective measurespromontory velocity

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

795
Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

13.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.2K
Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

795
Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

13.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Otoacoustic Emissions
  • Auditory Physiology

Background:

  • Intracochlear pressure is crucial for understanding bone conduction stimulation.
  • Direct measurement of intracochlear pressure is invasive.
  • Less invasive methods are needed to assess bone conduction device performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of predicting intracochlear pressure using ear canal pressure and promontory velocity.
  • To determine if normalizing data for stimulation position improves prediction accuracy.
  • To assess the potential of these methods as alternatives to direct intracochlear pressure measurement.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a percutaneous bone conduction device in six human cadaveric ears.
  • Measured intracochlear pressure, ear canal pressure, and promontory velocity across varying intensities, frequencies, and positions.
  • Analyzed linear correlations and root-mean-square error (RMSE) before and after normalizing for stimulation position.

Main Results:

  • Initial correlations showed moderate accuracy: R²=0.43 for ear canal pressure and R²=0.47 for promontory velocity.
  • Normalizing data for stimulation position significantly improved accuracy (R²=0.93 for both).
  • RMSE decreased substantially to approximately 2 dB after normalization, indicating higher precision.

Conclusions:

  • Ear canal pressure and promontory velocity show promise for predicting intracochlear pressure.
  • Accounting for stimulation position is critical for accurate predictions.
  • These findings support the use of these less invasive measures for evaluating bone conduction devices.