Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
24-h central pressure is a valuable predictor for left ventricular hypertrophy in non-dialysis patients with chronic
Cheng Chen1, Lingling Liu1, Sirui Liu1
1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, China.
Insights
Central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) better predicts left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients than brachial blood pressure (BP). This finding highlights cSBP
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Hypertension Research
Background:
- Existing research on 24-hour central and brachial blood pressure (BP) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) has limitations in sample size and consistency.
- The association between central and brachial BP and LVH has not been previously studied in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
- CKD is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, including LVH, making accurate BP assessment crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between 24-hour central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) and 24-hour brachial systolic blood pressure (bSBP) with LVH in non-dialysis CKD patients.
- To compare the efficacy of 24-h cSBP versus 24-h bSBP in identifying LVH in this population.
Main Methods:
- A multicentre, cross-sectional study involving 2117 non-dialysis CKD patients.
- 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring using MobilO-Graph PWA for both brachial and central BP.
- Echocardiography performed by trained cardiologists to assess LVH.
Main Results:
- 24-hour cSBP showed a stronger association with left ventricular mass index and LVH than 24-h bSBP in univariate and multivariate analyses.
- Multivariate net reclassification index (NRI) analysis indicated superior discriminatory power of 24-h cSBP over 24-h bSBP (NRI = 0.310, P < 0.001).
- Concordant hypertension (both central and brachial elevated) was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of LVH compared to isolated brachial hypertension or normotension.
Conclusions:
- 24-hour cSBP is more effective than 24-h bSBP in identifying LVH among non-dialysis CKD patients.
- Central BP monitoring provides valuable insights into cardiovascular remodeling in CKD patients.
- Targeting central hypertension may be crucial for preventing LVH in CKD.
Abstract:
The current research on the relationship between 24-h central pressure and 24-h brachial pressure with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is characterised by limited sample size and inconsistent findings. Furthermore, the association has never been explored in chronic kidney disease (CKD). A multicentre, cross-sectional study among non-dialysis patients with CKD was conducted. All participants underwent brachial and central ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using MobilO-Graph PWA, while trained cardiologists performed echocardiography. In this study, 2117 non-dialysis patients with CKD were examined. 24-h central systolic blood pressure with c2 calibration (24-h c2SBP) demonstrated a stronger association with left ventricular mass index and LVH compared with 24-h brachial systolic blood pressure (24-h bSBP) in the univariate and multivariate regression analyses. The multivariate net reclassification index (NRI) analysis revealed that 24-h c2SBP exhibited greater discriminatory power over 24-h bSBP (NRI = 0.310, 95% CI [0.192-0.429], P < 0.001). Applying 130/135 mmHg as the threshold for 24-h bSBP/c2SBP to cross-classify, the patients were divided into concordant normotension (1509 individuals), isolated brachial hypertension (155 individuals), isolated central hypertension (11 individuals), and concordant hypertension (442 individuals). With concordant normotension as the reference, the multivariable-adjusted ORs were 0.954 (95% CI, 0.534-1.640; P = 0.870) for isolated brachial hypertension and 2.585 (95%CI, 1.841-3.633; P < 0.001) for concordant hypertension. Among non-dialysis patients with CKD, 24-h c2SBP exhibits greater efficacy in identifying the presence of LVH compared with 24-h bSBP. The presence of LVH was greater in cases of concordant hypertension compared with cases of isolated brachial hypertension and concordant normotension.
More Related Videos
07:13A Rat Model of Pressure Overload Induced Moderate Remodeling and Systolic Dysfunction as Opposed to Overt Systolic Heart Failure
Published on: April 30, 2020
07:38Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Right Ventricle Function in a Rat Model of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Published on: January 20, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure