Diastolic function assessment with four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance using automatic deep...

Diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is a powerful contributor to the symptoms and prognosis of patients with heart failure. In patients with depressed LV systolic function, the E/A ratio, the ratio between the peak early (E) and the peak late (A) transmitral flow velocity, is the first step to defining the grade of diastolic dysfunction. Doppler echocardiography (echo) is the preferred imaging technique for diastolic function assessment, while cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is less established as a method. Previous four-dimensional (4D) Flow-based studies have looked at the E/A ratio proximal to the mitral valve, requiring manual interaction. In this study, we compare an automated, deep learning-based and two semi-automated approaches for 4D Flow CMR-based E/A ratio assessment to conventional, gold-standard echo-based methods.

Ninety-seven subjects with chronic ischemic heart disease underwent a cardiac echo followed by CMR investigation. 4D Flow-based E/A ratio values were computed using three different approaches; two semi-automated, assessing the E/A ratio by measuring the inflow velocity (MVvel) and the inflow volume (MVflow) at the mitral valve plane, and one fully automated, creating a full LV segmentation using a deep learning-based method with which the E/A ratio could be assessed without constraint to the mitral plane (LVvel).

MVvel, MVflow, and LVvel E/A ratios were strongly associated with echocardiographically derived E/A ratio (R² = 0.60, 0.58, 0.72). LVvel peak E and A showed moderate association to Echo peak E and A, while MVvel values were weakly associated. MVvel and MVflow EA ratios were very strongly associated with LVvel (R² = 0.84, 0.86). MVvel peak E was moderately associated with LVvel, while peak A showed a strong association (R² = 0.26, 0.57).

Peak E, peak A, and E/A ratio are integral to the assessment of diastolic dysfunction and may expand the utility of CMR studies in patients with cardiovascular disease. While underestimation of absolute peak E and A velocities was noted, the E/A ratio measured with all three 4D Flow methods was strongly associated with the gold standard Doppler echocardiography. The automatic, deep learning-based method performed best, with the most favorable runtime of ∼40 seconds. As both semi-automatic methods associated very strongly to LVvel, they could be employed as an alternative for estimation of E/A ratio.