Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

05:47
Use of a Rat Model to Study Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair
Published on: October 2, 2017
9.3K
Hernia Recurrence and Complications After Abdominal Reconstruction With Reinforced Versus Nonreinforced Biologic Mesh
Keith Sweitzer1, Aidan O'Shea, Claudia Tawil
1From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Annals of Plastic Surgery
|April 1, 2024
Summary
Reinforced biologic mesh (Ovitex) shows similar complication and recurrence rates compared to nonreinforced biologics in abdominal wall reconstruction. Nonreinforced biologics may be preferred for contaminated cases, while reinforced options are suitable for recurrent hernias.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Innovation
- Biomaterials Science
- Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
Background:
- Biologic and synthetic meshes are used for abdominal wall reconstruction, with biologics favored in contaminated settings due to incorporation.
- Synthetic meshes offer lower long-term recurrence but higher complication rates.
- Reinforced biologic mesh (Ovitex) combines biologic incorporation with synthetic strength.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the hypothesis that reinforced biologic mesh has similar complication rates but decreased long-term hernia recurrence compared to nonreinforced biologics.
- To compare outcomes of reinforced versus nonreinforced biologic mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction.
Main Methods:
- Single-center retrospective review of 254 patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction with biologic mesh from January 2013 to January 2022.
- Comparison of baseline characteristics, 90-day complications, and recurrence rates between reinforced (Ovitex) and nonreinforced biologic mesh groups.
- Statistical analysis using chi-squared, Wilcoxon rank sum, univariate, and multivariate logistic regression.
Main Results:
- Reinforced biologic mesh did not significantly impact 90-day complication or hernia recurrence rates on univariate or multivariate analysis.
- Previous mesh infection was a risk factor for recurrence; nonreinforced biologics were more common in infected cases, stoma takedowns, and bowel resections.
- Reinforced biologics were more frequently used for recurrent hernias not due to infection; high BMI (>35) was a risk factor for complications.
Conclusions:
- Reinforced and nonreinforced biologics demonstrate comparable risk profiles and recurrence rates in primary abdominal wall reconstruction.
- Nonreinforced biologics may be suitable for contaminated cases (infection, stoma takedown, bowel resection) with no difference in outcomes.
- Reinforced biologics may offer benefits in recurrent hernia repair where additional reinforcement is needed, with no difference in outcomes observed.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm management involves either conservative medical therapy or surgical intervention, depending on the size and symptoms of the aneurysm. Conservative management is generally reserved for smaller, asymptomatic aneurysms, while larger or symptomatic aneurysms often necessitate surgical repair.Conservative Medical TherapyFor small, asymptomatic aneurysms, particularly abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) less than 5.5 centimeters in diameter, conservative medical therapy is recommended. This...
Healing II: Complications
Complications during healing arise when tissue repair is altered by local or systemic factors. These changes involve abnormal collagen deposition, altered biomechanics, and reduced vascular supply, impairing restoration of normal structure and function.Loss of FunctionScar tissue differs significantly from the original tissue it replaces. In the skin, fibrosis lacks adnexal structures such as hair follicles, sebaceous glands, and sweat glands. Their absence reduces tactile sensitivity, impairs...

