Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

07:32
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
1.1K
The Common Retention Practices Among Orthodontists from Different Countries.
Mohammed Almuzian1, Samer Mheissen2, Haris Khan3
1University of Edinburgh, DclinDent, Department of Orthodontics, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
|April 1, 2024
Summary
Orthodontists commonly use thermoplastic retainers for the upper arch and bonded retainers for the lower arch. Clinical factors significantly influence these orthodontic retention choices.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Dental Materials Science
Background:
- Orthodontic treatment aims for long-term stability, necessitating effective retention strategies.
- Understanding current retention practices is crucial for optimizing post-treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify prevalent orthodontic retention practices among clinicians.
- To explore factors influencing the selection of retention protocols.
- To analyze variations in retention strategies across orthodontists.
Main Methods:
- A validated online questionnaire was distributed to 3,000 orthodontic residents and clinicians.
- The survey collected data on demographics, prescribed retention appliances, influencing factors, and adjunctive procedures.
- Descriptive statistics and inferential tests (Chi2, Kendall's Tau-b) were employed for analysis.
Main Results:
- A response rate of 18.5% (555 participants) was achieved.
- Thermoplastic retainers were favored for the maxillary arch (adults 47.4%, adolescents 42.3%).
- Bonded retainers were preferred for the mandibular arch (adults 44.9%, adolescents 40.7%).
- Arch expansion and post-treatment interdigitation were key factors in retainer selection.
- A majority (68.6%) supported the development of professional retention guidelines.
Conclusions:
- Thermoplastic retainers dominate maxillary retention, while bonded retainers are preferred for the mandible.
- Clinical experience, practice setting, and malocclusion/treatment factors shape appliance choice.
- Demographic variations and survey participation rates warrant consideration in interpreting findings.

