Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Picometer-Precision Atomic Position Tracking through Electron Microscopy
Published on: July 3, 2021
Compression Eliminates Charge Traps by Stabilizing Perovskite Grain Boundary Structures: An Ab Initio Analysis with
Dongyu Liu1, Yifan Wu2, Mikhail R Samatov1
1HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia.
Abstract:
Grain boundaries (GBs) play an important role in determining the optoelectronic properties of perovskites, requiring an atomistic understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Strain engineering has recently been employed in perovskite solar cells, providing a novel perspective on the role of perovskite GBs. Here, we theoretically investigate the impact of axial strain on the geometric and electronic properties of a common CsPbBr3 GB. We develop a machine learning force field and perform ab initio calculations to analyze the behavior of GB models with different axial strains on a nanosecond time scale. Our results demonstrate that compressing the GB efficiently suppresses structural fluctuations and eliminates trap states originating from large-scale distortions. The GB becomes more amorphous under compressive strain, which makes the relationship between the electronic structure and axial strain nonmonotonic. These results can help clarify the conflicts in perovskite GB experiments.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...

