Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Implicit Memories01:24

Implicit Memories

130
Implicit memories, also known as non-declarative memories, are long-term memories that function outside of conscious awareness. These memories influence behavior and skills without explicit knowledge. This type of memory is evident in tasks like playing tennis, snowboarding, and texting. Implicit memory has three subsystems: procedural memory, conditioning, and priming. This type of memory is essential in various activities, from everyday tasks to specialized skills.
One key aspect of implicit...
130
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

119
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
119

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Management and survival outcomes of desmoplastic small round cell tumor: a retrospective cohort study from a tertiary cancer center.

BMC cancer·2025
Same author

Separating the control of moving and holding in human post-stroke arm paresis.

eLife·2025
Same author

Tiny visual latencies can profoundly impair implicit sensorimotor learning.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Reinforcement Learning is Impaired in the Sub-acute Post-stroke Period.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2025
Same author

The cerebellum acts as the analog to the medial temporal lobe for sensorimotor memory.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir for Acute COVID-19 in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease and Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

JACC. Advances·2024
Same journal

A human-specific genetic modifier reconfigures large-scale cortical network dynamics underlying behavioral performance.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

<i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> uses a eukaryotic-like uridyltransferase to make UDP-GlcNAc for cell wall synthesis.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Dynamic redistribution of eIF4F controls cap-dependent translation initiation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

When does additional information improve accuracy of RNA secondary structure prediction?

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Normative brain-state trajectories reveal deviation from healthy aging in Alzheimer's disease.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Noradrenergic infraslow rhythm during sleep is the critical link between heart-rate dynamics and memory consolidation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.5K

Subtle Visual Latency Can Profoundly Impair Implicit Sensorimotor Learning.

Alkis M Hadjiosif, George Abraham, Tanvi Ranjan

    Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
    |April 1, 2024
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Reducing visual feedback latency significantly enhances implicit sensorimotor learning by 50%. This improvement, particularly in the sub-100ms range, optimizes motor skill acquisition and training effectiveness.

    More Related Videos

    Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
    05:12

    Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

    Published on: September 18, 2017

    545.9K
    Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
    06:04

    Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

    Published on: March 4, 2014

    21.0K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

    The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
    10:39

    The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

    Published on: May 3, 2018

    8.5K
    Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
    05:12

    Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

    Published on: September 18, 2017

    545.9K
    Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
    06:04

    Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

    Published on: March 4, 2014

    21.0K

    Area of Science:

    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Neuroscience
    • Motor Learning

    Background:

    • Sub-100ms visual feedback latencies impair performance in diverse motor tasks.
    • These latencies are prevalent in computer-based experiments studying sensorimotor learning.
    • Neurophysiological evidence suggests cerebellar LTD and cortical LTP are disrupted by short latencies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the hypothesis that implicit sensorimotor learning is particularly sensitive to sub-100ms visual feedback latencies.
    • To quantify the impact of latency reduction on implicit and explicit motor learning.
    • To explore the relationship between feedback latency and neural plasticity in motor learning.

    Main Methods:

    • Experiments were conducted with latency-optimized feedback conditions.
    • Latency was reduced from 85ms to 25ms.
    • Implicit and explicit learning components were measured and compared.

    Main Results:

    • Improving latency by 60ms (85ms to 25ms) increased implicit learning by 50%.
    • Explicit learning decreased proportionally with the improvement in latency.
    • Implicit sensorimotor learning demonstrated higher sensitivity to latencies below 100ms compared to higher latencies.

    Conclusions:

    • Implicit sensorimotor learning is highly sensitive to visual feedback latencies within the sub-100ms range.
    • Latency reduction in computer-based training offers significant benefits for implicit sensorimotor learning.
    • Variations in implicit motor learning across studies may be attributed to differences in feedback latency.