Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating HR-Dependent Cardiac Function in Mouse Models Through a Novel Atrial-Pacing Approach
Published on: July 21, 2023
Target heart rate in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: Goldilocks zone
1Sunderland Royal Hospital, Kayll Road, Sunderland SR4 7TP, UK.
Insights
Managing heart rate in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is complex. Optimal heart rate control strategies require further investigation through dedicated clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are increasingly prevalent comorbidities.
- Lower heart rates (HR) in HFrEF are linked to reduced morbidity and mortality, potentially via mechanisms like improved diastolic filling time.
- Current guidelines present a dilemma for HR control in patients with both AF and HFrEF, balancing potential benefits of lower rates against physiological needs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the conundrum of optimal heart rate (HR) control in patients with both atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- To review existing evidence and highlight the need for dedicated randomized controlled trials investigating HR control strategies in this specific patient subgroup.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature, including landmark trials like RACE II and retrospective analyses of HFrEF trials (CHARM, PARADIGM, ATMOSPHERE).
- Analysis of physiological considerations for HR control in AF and HFrEF.
- Examination of prognostic markers and their impact on the association between HR control and outcomes.
Main Results:
- The RACE II trial suggested a lenient HR control strategy (<110 bpm) is safer and more attainable than strict control (<80 bpm) in permanent AF.
- Retrospective analyses of HFrEF trials hint at better outcomes with less stringent HR targets in AF patients, but this association diminishes after adjusting for prognostic factors.
- No definitive evidence from dedicated trials exists for optimal HR control in the combined AF and HFrEF population.
Conclusions:
- There is a significant need for dedicated randomized controlled trials to determine the optimal rate control strategy for patients with both AF and HFrEF.
- Effective anticoagulation and guideline-directed medical therapy remain crucial, irrespective of the chosen HR control strategy.
- The complex interplay between AF, HFrEF, and HR requires further research to optimize patient outcomes.
Abstract:
The rates of atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) continue to grow with many patients suffering from their combined impact on quality of life and prognosis. A lower heart rate (HR) in HFrEF is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality due to beta-blocker and ivabradine therapy. Postulated mechanisms include reduced neurohumoral activation, increased diastolic filling time and myocardial energy conservation. In contrast, the landmark randomised controlled non-inferiority RACE II trial demonstrated that a lenient rate control strategy (target HR <110 beats per minute [bpm]) was more attainable and safer than a strict rate control strategy (resting HR <80 bpm) in permanent AF. Physiologically, a higher HR is needed to compensate for the lost 'atrial kick' that contributes to the cardiac output by coordinated atrial contractions in normal sinus rhythm. This leaves the not insignificant number of patients with HFrEF and AF in a conundrum over optimal HR control. Retrospective analyses of AF and HR control in landmark HFrEF trials (e.g. CHARM, PARADIGM and ATMOSPHERE) point towards better outcomes with a less stringent target HR. However, this association disappears after adjustment for known prognostic markers in HFrEF, including left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association class and NT-proBNP levels. There is a clear need for dedicated randomised controlled trials, investigating rate control strategies in this increasingly large subgroup of patients. Regardless of rate control strategy, effective anti-coagulation and guideline-directed medical therapy must not be forgotten in the treatment of patients with HFrEF and AF.
More Related Videos
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
28:13Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Increased pulse rate
Many factors can elevate the risk of developing tachycardia. These include advanced age, a family history of arrhythmias, and an...
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow...
Exercise and Cardiac Output
Sustained exercise increases the muscles' oxygen demand, which can be...