Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

5.7K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
5.7K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.1K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

6.2K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
6.2K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.6K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.6K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

7.3K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
7.3K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

7.7K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
7.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An ecological text message experiment of Hispanic and Latino adolescents' recognition of and emotional responses to digital dating abuse behaviors.

Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence·2026
Same author

Questionable research practices and cumulative science: The consequences of selective reporting on effect size bias and heterogeneity.

Psychological methods·2023
Same author

Validity and reliability of the Body-Esteem Scale among a diverse sample of preadolescent youth.

Psychological assessment·2023
Same author

Appropriately estimating the standardized average treatment effect with missing data: A simulation and primer.

Behavior research methods·2022
Same author

Sample size planning for replication studies: The devil is in the design.

Psychological methods·2022
Same author

Multiplicity in multiple regression: Defining the issue, evaluating solutions, and integrating perspectives.

Psychological methods·2022
Same journal

Bayesian Machine Learning Tools for Alcohol Use Disorder Research: The bpaup R Package.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

A Unified Framework for Jointly modelling Response Times and Item Position Effects in Computer-Based Learning Assessments.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

Generalizability Theory Applied to Daily Relationship Quality: Substantive and Statistical Directions.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

A Modularized Higher-Order Diagnostic Classification Model for Clustered Attribute Hierarchies.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

Generalizing Causal Effects to a Target Population Without Individual-Level Data from the Target Population.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

betaselectr: Selective (and Proper) Standardization in Structural Equation Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.1K

A Confidence Interval for the Difference Between Standardized Regression Coefficients.

Samantha F Anderson1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

Multivariate Behavioral Research
|April 1, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a formal confidence interval for comparing standardized regression coefficients, offering a more rigorous alternative to informal methods. The new approach demonstrates superior performance in simulations for statistical analysis.

Keywords:
Standardized regression coefficientconfidence intervalmultiple regression

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

4.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.1K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

4.0K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Quantitative Psychology
  • Econometrics

Background:

  • Informal comparisons of standardized regression slopes are common but lack statistical rigor.
  • Formal interval-based methods provide more reliable comparisons of predictor importance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a delta-method-based confidence interval for the difference between two standardized regression coefficients.
  • To provide researchers with a formal tool for comparing standardized regression coefficients.

Main Methods:

  • Monte Carlo simulation studies were used to evaluate the proposed confidence interval.
  • The performance was assessed based on coverage rate, interval width, Type I error rate, and statistical power.
  • An alternative approach using standard covariance matrices was compared against the proposed method.

Main Results:

  • The proposed delta-method-based confidence interval demonstrated superior performance compared to the alternative approach.
  • Simulations evaluated software implementations, small sample performance, and multiple comparison procedures.
  • The method showed good performance across various conditions, including finite sample sizes.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed confidence interval offers a valuable, formal tool for researchers comparing standardized regression coefficients.
  • This method serves as a supplement to, rather than a replacement for, existing analytical techniques.
  • Guidance on sample size planning and an R function are provided to facilitate practical application.