Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

9.9K
Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
9.9K
Master Transcription Regulators02:23

Master Transcription Regulators

6.9K
Master transcription regulators are regulatory proteins that are predominantly responsible for regulating the expression of multiple genes. Often these genes work in concert to drive a  complex process. Activation of a master transcription regulator can lead to a cascade of transcriptional activation necessary for that outcome. These regulators can directly bind to the regulatory sequences of the various genes involved, or they can indirectly regulate transcription by binding to regulatory...
6.9K
Combinatorial Gene Control02:33

Combinatorial Gene Control

8.3K
Combinatorial gene control is the synergistic action of several transcriptional factors to regulate the expression of a single gene. The absence of one or more of these factors may lead to a significant difference in the level of gene expression or repression.
The expression of more than 30,000 genes is controlled by approximately 2000-3000 transcription factors. This is possible because a single transcription factor can recognize more than one regulatory sequence. The specificity in gene...
8.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

BiGER: Bayesian rank aggregation in genomics with extended ranking schemes.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

MisTIC: Missegmented Transcript Inference Correction for Improved Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

A Bayesian Model for Paired Data in Genome-Wide Association Studies with Application to Breast Cancer.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Mapping cellular interactions from spatially resolved transcriptomics data.

Nature methods·2024
Same author

Assessing next-generation sequencing-based computational methods for predicting transcriptional regulators with query gene sets.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2024
Same author

BIT: Bayesian Identification of Transcriptional Regulators from Epigenomics-Based Query Region Sets.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

709

Assessing NGS-based computational methods for predicting transcriptional regulators with query gene sets.

Zeyu Lu, Xue Xiao, Qiang Zheng

    Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
    |April 2, 2024
    PubMed
    Summary

    This review evaluates computational methods for predicting transcriptional regulators (TRs) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. BART, ChIP-Atlas, and Lisa show superior performance in identifying TRs from gene sets.

    More Related Videos

    Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis
    09:58

    Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis

    Published on: June 27, 2020

    2.8K
    In Vitro Selection of Engineered Transcriptional Repressors for Targeted Epigenetic Silencing
    10:44

    In Vitro Selection of Engineered Transcriptional Repressors for Targeted Epigenetic Silencing

    Published on: May 5, 2023

    1.4K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

    Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
    03:37

    Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

    Published on: March 1, 2024

    709
    Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis
    09:58

    Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis

    Published on: June 27, 2020

    2.8K
    In Vitro Selection of Engineered Transcriptional Repressors for Targeted Epigenetic Silencing
    10:44

    In Vitro Selection of Engineered Transcriptional Repressors for Targeted Epigenetic Silencing

    Published on: May 5, 2023

    1.4K

    Area of Science:

    • Bioinformatics
    • Computational Biology
    • Genomics

    Background:

    • Accurate identification of transcriptional regulators (TRs) is crucial for understanding biological development, disease mechanisms, and therapeutic target prediction.
    • Numerous computational methods utilizing next-generation sequencing (NGS) data exist, but a systematic evaluation is lacking.

    Approach:

    • Classified NGS-based TR prediction methods into library-based and region-based categories.
    • Conducted benchmark studies evaluating accuracy, sensitivity, coverage, and usability of these methods using molecular experimental datasets.
    • Compared NGS-based methods against traditional motif-based approaches.

    Key Points:

    • NGS-based methods generally outperform motif-based methods for TR prediction.
    • Region-centric NGS methods utilizing larger databases exhibit better performance.
    • BART, ChIP-Atlas, and Lisa are recommended for their strong performance across various scenarios.

    Conclusions:

    • Identified limitations of current NGS-based TR prediction tools.
    • Highlighted potential areas for future improvements in computational TR identification methods.