Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Permanent Cerebral Vessel Occlusion via Double Ligature and Transection
Published on: July 21, 2013
Retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention via ipsilateral collaterals
Ahmed Al-Ogaili1, Michaella Alexandrou1, Athanasios Rempakos1
1Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Insights
Retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using ipsilateral epicardial collaterals (IEC) shows similar success rates but increased complications compared to other collateral types.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Interventions
- Interventional Cardiology
- Coronary Artery Disease
Background:
- Limited data exists on retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) utilizing ipsilateral epicardial collaterals (IEC).
- Understanding the feasibility and outcomes of IEC in retrograde CTO PCI is crucial for expanding treatment options.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical, angiographic characteristics, and outcomes of retrograde CTO PCI via IEC versus other collateral pathways.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of using IEC for complex coronary interventions.
Main Methods:
- An observational cohort study utilizing data from the Prospective Global registry for the study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO).
- Analysis of 4466 retrograde CTO PCI cases, with a specific focus on 191 cases using IEC.
- Comparison of procedural success, technical success, and complication rates between IEC and non-IEC collateral groups.
Main Results:
- Wiring success for IEC was 50%. The left circumflex artery was the most common target in the IEC group.
- Technical (76% vs. 79%) and procedural success rates (74% vs. 79%) were comparable between IEC and other collateral groups.
- IEC cases exhibited a significantly higher rate of periprocedural complications (25.8% vs. 16.4%), including perforations and pericardiocentesis.
Conclusions:
- Retrograde CTO PCI via IEC achieves similar technical and procedural success rates as other collateral approaches.
- The use of IEC is associated with a higher incidence of periprocedural complications, necessitating careful consideration and technique.
Background:
There is limited data on retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via ipsilateral epicardial collaterals (IEC).
Aims:
To compare the clinical and angiographic characteristics, and outcomes of retrograde CTO PCI via IEC versus other collaterals in a large multicenter registry.
Methods:
Observational cohort study from the Prospective Global registry for the study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO).
Results:
Of 4466 retrograde cases performed between 2012 and 2023, crossing through IEC was attempted in 191 (4.3%) cases with 50% wiring success. The most common target vessel in the IEC group was the left circumflex (50%), in comparison to other retrograde cases, where the right coronary artery was most common (70%). The Japanese CTO score was similar between the two groups (3.13 ± 1.23 vs. 3.06 ± 1.06, p = 0.456); however, the IEC group had a higher Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO) score (1.95 ± 1.02 vs. 1.27 ± 0.92, p < 0.0001). The most used IEC guidewire was the SUOH 03 (39%), and the most frequently used microcatheter was the Caravel (43%). Dual injection was less common in IEC cases (66% vs. 89%, p < 0.0001). Technical (76% vs. 79%, p = 0.317) and procedural success rates (74% vs. 79%, p = 0.281) were not different between the two groups. However, IEC cases had a higher procedural complications rate (25.8% vs. 16.4%, p = 0.0008), including perforations (17.3% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.0001), pericardiocentesis (3.1% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.018), and dissection/thrombus of the donor vessel (3.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.002).
Conclusion:
The use of IEC for retrograde CTO PCI was associated with similar technical and procedural success rates when compared with other retrograde cases, but higher incidence of periprocedural complications.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

