Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

Pollination and Flower Structure

Pollination and Flower Structure

Flowers are the reproductive, seed-producing structures of angiosperms. Typically, flowers consist of sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels. Sepals and petals are the vegetative flower organs. Stamens and carpels are the reproductive organs.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Estimating mercury exposure in amphibians using non-lethal tissue sampling.

Ecotoxicology (London, England)·2026

Same author

Cotton farming affects ileal virome in a sedentary wild passerine.

Animal microbiome·2026

Same author

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and other contaminants of concern in tribal waters of Montana.

Environmental science. Processes & impacts·2026

Same author

The Appalbees menu: a multiyear, multilocus metagenetic assessment of pollen foraging by Appalachian <i>Bombus affinis</i> workers.

PeerJ·2026

Same author

Performance evaluation and methods comparison of transcriptomic-based approaches for the characterization of wastewater treatment effluent.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2025

Same author

Imidacloprid in United States Rivers, 2013-2022: Persistent Presence and Emerging Chronic Hazard.

Environmental science & technology·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2025

A Rapid Method to Confine and Safely Handle Bees in the Field

A Rapid Method to Confine and Safely Handle Bees in the Field

Published on: August 23, 2024

Comparing modern identification methods for wild bees: Metabarcoding and image-based morphological taxonomic

Cassandra D Smith¹, Robert S Cornman², Jennifer A Fike²

¹Oregon Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Bend, Oregon, United States of America.

|April 2, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing image-based morphological identification and DNA metabarcoding for wild bees reveals both methods have limitations. Combining techniques offers valuable genus- and species-level data for conservation research.

More Related Videos

Collection and Identification of Pollen from Honey Bee Colonies

Collection and Identification of Pollen from Honey Bee Colonies

Published on: January 19, 2021

Empirical, Metagenomic, and Computational Techniques Illuminate the Mechanisms by which Fungicides Compromise Bee Health

Empirical, Metagenomic, and Computational Techniques Illuminate the Mechanisms by which Fungicides Compromise Bee Health

Published on: October 9, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2025

A Rapid Method to Confine and Safely Handle Bees in the Field

A Rapid Method to Confine and Safely Handle Bees in the Field

Published on: August 23, 2024

Collection and Identification of Pollen from Honey Bee Colonies

Collection and Identification of Pollen from Honey Bee Colonies

Published on: January 19, 2021

Empirical, Metagenomic, and Computational Techniques Illuminate the Mechanisms by which Fungicides Compromise Bee Health

Empirical, Metagenomic, and Computational Techniques Illuminate the Mechanisms by which Fungicides Compromise Bee Health

Published on: October 9, 2017

Area of Science:

Ecology
Entomology
Conservation Biology

Background:

Wild bee populations are declining globally, necessitating accurate distribution and diversity assessments.
Traditional wild bee identification relies on expert taxonomy or genetic analysis, each with distinct advantages and limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the efficacy of image-based morphological identification versus DNA metabarcoding for identifying wild bees.
To evaluate the combined potential of these methods for advancing wild bee research and conservation.

Main Methods:

Wild bees were collected from Iowa conservation grasslands and identified using morphological analysis of images and DNA metabarcoding of composite legs.
Sanger sequencing of individual bee legs served as a positive control for metabarcoding accuracy.

Main Results:

Morphological identification yielded 36 taxa across 22 genera, with high species-level accuracy for Bombus.
Metabarcoding provided genus-level assignments for 18 genera, resolving some morphologically similar taxa but missing some genera, including kleptoparasitic bees.
Sanger sequencing confirmed metabarcoding presence/absence data and identified cryptic species, while morphological methods were limited by image quality and genetic methods by database completeness.

Conclusions:

Image-based and DNA metabarcoding methods for wild bee identification have complementary strengths and weaknesses.
Combining morphological and genetic approaches can provide comprehensive genus- and species-level data, crucial for effective wild bee conservation and distribution studies.
Further refinement of these methods could facilitate field applications, accelerating ecological research and conservation efforts for declining bee populations.